- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
慢性膝关节疼痛针刺治疗定量差异再分析
慢性膝关节疼痛针刺治疗定量差异再分析
摘 要:引入定量差异(QD)对Hinman等发现毫针或激光针刺治疗50岁以上患者的慢性膝关节疼痛的效果并不优于激光假照射组的原始数据进行了再分析。在Hinman等的9个评价指标的基础上,定义了9个过程参数和33个组合参数的过程参数分第12周和1年两个时间段,总共获得102个表型参数。研究发现,毫针组、激光组和激光假照射组优于对照组的统计差异或QD分别有64、22和39个表型参数达到显著性量级;毫针组优于激光组和激光假照射组的QD分别有29和10个表型参数达到显著性量级;激光假照射组优于激光组的QD有11个。结果表明,毫针、激光假照射和激光对50岁以上膝关节疼痛患者的治疗效果由高到低依次优于对照组。
关 键 词:运动医学;骨关节炎;慢性膝关节疼痛;针刺;激光;表型组学;定量差异
中图分类号:G804.5 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1006-7116(2017)02-0115-07
A reanalysis of quantitative differences in the acupuncture therapy of
chronic knee joint pain
WU Chong-yun,YANG Luo-dan,LIU Cheng-yi,ZHU Ling,DUAN Rui,ZHANG Quan-guang
(Laboratory of Laser Sports Medicine,School of Physical Education,South China Normal University,
Guangzhou 510006,China)
Abstract: By introducing quantitative difference (QD), the authors reanalyzed the original data which showed that the effect of needle or laser acupuncture therapy on chronic knee joint pain suffered by patients over 50 was not better than that on the laser sham irradiation group, found by Hinman etc. Based on the 9 evaluation indexes set by Hinman, the authors defined 9 process parameters and 33 process parameters of composite parameters, and obtained totally 102 phenotypic parameters in such two time periods as 12 weeks and 1 year, and revealed the following findings: among the statistical differences or QD which showed that the effect of the needle group, the laser group and the laser sham irradiation group was better than that of the control group, there were respectively 64, 22 and 39 phenotypic parameters which reached a significant level; among the QD which showed that the effect of the needle group was better than that of the laser sham irradiation group, there were respectively 29 and 10 phenotypic parameters which reached a significant level; there were 11 QD which showed that the effect of the laser sham irradiation group was better than that of the laser group. The said findings indicated that the therapeutic effect of needle, laser sha
文档评论(0)