城市居民深度休闲与主观幸福感的相关研究——以南昌市为例-research on the relationship between deep leisure and subjective well - being of urban residents —— taking nanchang city as an example.docxVIP

摘要 摘要 万方数据 万方数据 摘 要 目的：随着经济的发展，国民生活水平的不断提高，闲暇活动日益丰富并 且更加有深度。为更好的了解深度休闲与幸福感的关系，本研究旨在以具有休 闲行为的南昌市城市居民作为研究对象，展开深度休闲现状调查以及深度休闲 与主观幸福感的关系调查。 方法：本研究使用《深度休闲量表》、《主观幸福感量表》选取南昌市 350 名具有深度休闲行为的城市居民进行调查研究。采用 SPSS17.0 统计软件对数据 进行分析处理。 结果：本研究通过定量研究的方法，证实了深度休闲对主观幸福感的正向 影响。深度休闲活动参与者通过长期参与的休闲活动具有坚持不懈的毅力、个 人努力、持续获益、次文化、强烈认同感、生涯性这六大特征，这都易于使人 产生幸福的感受。本研究发现，具有休闲行为的南昌市城市居民总体深度休闲 水平与主观幸福感水平均较高，并且在对性别、年龄、婚姻状况、伴侣支持、 教育程度、职业、月收入、休闲活动频率、休闲活动年限、选择动机变量上的 研究对比发现，结果显示均存在显著的差异。 关键词：深度休闲；主观幸福感；城市居民 I Abst Abstract ABSTRACT Objective: This research is designed to perform a comprehensive investigation of the status of serious leisure perspective and the relationship between serious leisure perspective and subjective well-being with applying the “Scale of Serious Leisure Perspective” and “Scale of Subjective Well-being” as tools, by aiming the residents of Nanchang who have serious leisure behavior as research subjects. Methodology: “The Scale of Serious Leisure Perspective” and “The Scale of Subjective Welling-being” select 350 residents with serious leisure behavior of Nanchang city to undertake the research. SPSS 17.0 statistic software has been adopted as to perform the data analysis. Results:: By applying the quantitative research methodology, this research proves the positive influence of serious leisure to subjective well-being. Participants of serious leisure activities acquire six personal traits including including consistency, motivation, leisure benefits, subculture, sense of commitment, and career by taking part in serious leisure on a long-term orientation. These traits tend to produce feeling of happiness. This research also discovers that the integrated serious leisure and subjective well-being of Nanchang city dwellers stays at a relatively high level. Moreover, the results have significant difference with choosing different variables such as gender, age, martial status, partner support, education level, occupation, monthly income, frequency of leisure activities, leisure activities li