无痛胃肠镜与常规胃肠镜在消化道疾病中临床应用.docVIP

无痛胃肠镜与常规胃肠镜在消化道疾病中临床应用.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
无痛胃肠镜与常规胃肠镜在消化道疾病中临床应用

无痛胃肠镜与常规胃肠镜在消化道疾病中临床应用   [摘要]目的 比较无痛胃肠镜与常规胃肠镜在消化道疾病中的应用效果。方法 选取我院2015年9月~2017年6月收治的396例消化道疾病患者,按其选择检查方式的不同分为对照组和观察组,每组198例。观察组予以无痛胃肠镜检查,对照组采用常规胃肠镜检查。记录比较两组胃肠镜检查前、中、后患者的心率、血压及血氧饱和度(SpO2)变化情况,检查过程中不良反应发生情况,并比较两组检查效果。结果 观察组在各时间点的心率、血压、SpO2均无明显变化(P0.05),且术中、术后心率和血压均显著优于对照组(P0.05)。?^察组不良反应发生率为10.10%,显著低于对照组的57.58%(P0.01)。检查效果观察组优良率为93.93%,显著优于对照组的77.28%(P0.01)。结论 与常规胃肠镜对比,无痛胃肠镜痛苦小,不良反应率低,患者依从性更高,值得进一步临床推广。   [关键词]无痛胃肠镜,常规胃肠镜,消化道疾病   [中图分类号] R571 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2017)10(b)-0030-03   [Abstract]Objective To compare the effect of painless gastrointestinal endoscopy and conventional gastrointestinal endoscopy in digestive tract diseases.Methods 396 digestive tract diseases patients from September 2015 to June 2017 in our hospital were selected.Patients were divided into two groups according to different check mode,and each group was 198 cases.Patients in observation group were used painless gastrointestinal endoscopy and the control group were used conventional gastrointestinal endoscopy.The changes of heart rate,blood pressure and blood oxygen saturation(SpO2) in the two groups before,during and after the examination were recorded and compared.The adverse reactions in the course of the examination were compared,and the results of the two groups were compared.Results The heart rate,blood pressure and SpO2 of the observation group did not change significantly at each time point (P0.05);The heart rate and blood pressure during operation and after operation were significantly better than those in the control group (P0.05).The incidence rate of adverse effect in observation group was 10.10%,significant lower than that was 57.58% in control group (P0.01).In the examination,the excellent and good rate of the observation group was 93.93%,which was significantly better than that of the control group (77.28%) (P0.01).Conclusion Compared with routine gastrointestinal endoscopy,painless gastrointestinal endoscopy has less pain,lower rate of adverse reactions,higher compl

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档