早期综合康复治疗急性脑栓塞性脑梗患者临床效果探讨.docVIP

早期综合康复治疗急性脑栓塞性脑梗患者临床效果探讨.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
早期综合康复治疗急性脑栓塞性脑梗患者临床效果探讨

早期综合康复治疗急性脑栓塞性脑梗患者临床效果探讨   DOI:10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2017.11.109   [摘要] 目的 探讨早期综合康复治疗急性脑栓塞性脑梗的临床效果。方法 方便选取该院急诊部2014年10月―2015年10月就治的89例患者,随机分为观察组(早期综合康复治疗组)45例和对照组(常规康复治疗组)44例,比较两组治疗效果。 结果 观察组的平衡功能得分(12.84±2.31)分及日常生活能力得分(30.9±3.5)分显著优于对照组的平衡功能得分(7.85±1.49)分及日常生活能力得分(27.6±3.2)分(P0.05);观察组的脑卒中运动功能分级率显著优于对照组(P0.05);观察组的肢体运动功能得分(68.6±5.4)分,优于对照组的肢体运动功能得分(50.2±4.3)(P0.05)。采用早期综合康复治疗的观察组各项指标均优于对照组(采用常规康复治疗),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 对急性脑栓塞性脑梗采用早期综合康复治疗效果显著、安全可靠。   [关键词] 早期综合康复治疗;急性脑栓塞;临床效果   [中图分类号] R743.3 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)04(b)-0109-03   Study on Clinical Effect of Early Comprehensive Rehabilitation in Treatment of Patients with Acute Cerebral Embolism   HE Mai-ding, QIAN Yan, JI Mei-lian   Department of Rehabilitation, Qujing Frist People’s Hospital, Qujing, Yunnan Province, 6550001 China   [Abstract] Objective To study the clinical effect of early comprehensive rehabilitation in treatment of patients with acute cerebral embolism. Methods Convenient selection 89 cases of patients diagnosed in our hospital from October 2014 to October 2015 were selected and randomly divided into the two groups, the observation group with 45 cases was treated with early general comprehensive rehabilitation, while the control group with 44 cases was treated with routine rehabilitation, and the treatment effect was compared between the two groups. Results The balance function score and daily living abilities score in the observation group were obviously better than those in the control group[(12.84±2.31)points, (30.9±3.5)points vs (7.85±1.49)points, (27.6±3.2)points](P0.05), and the stroke motor function classification score in the observation group was obviously better than that in the control group(P0.05), and the extremity motor function score in the observation group was better than that in the extremity motor function in the control group[(68.6±5.4)point vs (50.2±4.3)point](P0.05), and various indexes in the observation group were better than those in the control

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档