- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
欧美体育社会学研究中作者机构及合作特征
欧美体育社会学研究中作者机构及合作特征
摘 要:以刊载于《国际体育社会学评论》《体育社会学杂志》《体育与社会问题杂志》且被SSCI数据库收录的682篇论文为研究样本,运用三角互证法、网络分析法和比较分析法,探讨欧美体育社会学研究中作者、机构及科研合作特征。结果表明,欧洲体育社会学研究存在女性“科研产出之谜”,男性、中级职称作者比例高于北美,但北美博士及高级职称作者比例略高于欧洲,且两地均涌现出一批高产的核心作者。在作者科研合作方面,北美作者具有更多科研合作经历,形成密度相对较高的合作网络和数量较多的研究团队。在科研机构方面,欧洲作者主要来自高等院校,而北美作者所在高校的2级科研机构类型相对多元,并形成一批高产和处于科研合作网络中心的研究机构,北美机构合作网络密度也高于欧洲且具有更多的国际合作。
关 键 词:体育文献计量;作者;科研合作;欧美
中图分类号:G80-05 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1006-7116(2017)06-0079-05
Abstract: Basing the research samples on 682 theses published on such 3 international peer reviewed journals of sports sociology as International Review of Sports Sociology, Journal of Sports Sociology and Journal of Sports and social Issues and indexed by SSCI database, by applying triangular mutual proof method, network analysis method and comparative analysis method, the authors probed into the characteristics of the authors, institutions and cooperation in sports sociological research in Europe and North America, and revealed the following findings: in sports sociological research in Europe, there was a women “scientific research output mystery”, the percentage of the male authors with an intermediate title was higher than that in North America, but the percentage of the authors with a doctor degree or a senior title in North America was slightly higher than that in Europe, and a number of highly productive core authors emerged in both regions; in terms of author scientific research cooperation, the authors in North America had more scientific research cooperation, having formed density relatively high cooperation networks and number relatively great research teams; in terms of scientific research institution, the Occidental authors were mostly from institutions of higher learning, while the secondary scientific research institutions of universities which North American authors were at were relatively type diversified, and formed a number of highly productive research institutions which were at the center of a scientific research
原创力文档


文档评论(0)