肛肠科手术患者医院感染管理方法研究及分析.docVIP

肛肠科手术患者医院感染管理方法研究及分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
肛肠科手术患者医院感染管理方法研究及分析

肛肠科手术患者医院感染管理方法研究及分析   【摘 要】目的:探索肛肠科手术患者医院感染管理方法。方法:选择2016年12月-2017年12月期间在我院肛肠科接受手术治疗的患者54例作为研究对象,随机划入观察组和对照组,其中观察组27例,对照组27例,分别接受医院感染分级管理和常规管理,比较两组患者的护理满意度以及院内感染的发生例数。结果:观察组患者切口感染1例,呼吸道感染0例,尿路感染1例,总发生率7.4%;对照组患者切口感染4例,呼吸道感染2例,尿路感染2例,总发生率29.6%;组间差异有统计学意义,P0.05。观察组患者对护理服务满意16例,较满意10例,不满意1例,总满意度96.3%;对照组患者对护理服务满意11例,较满意10例,不满意6例,总满意度77.8%;组间差异有统计学意义,P0.05。结论:肛肠科手术患者医院感染的分级管理应用效果显著,值得临床应用和推广。   【关键词】肛肠科手术;医院感染管理   Abstract Objective: To explore the management methods of hospital infection in patients with anorectal surgery. Methods: in August 2016 - December 2017 in our hospital during the period of 54 patients with anorectal surgery treatment as the research object, randomly into observation group and control group, 27 cases of observation group and control group in 27 cases, classification management and regular hospital infection management, respectively, compared two groups of patients satisfaction with nursing care as well as the occurrence of nosocomial infection cases. Results: there were 1 case of incision infection in the observation group, 0 cases of respiratory tract infection, 1 case of urinary tract infection, and the total incidence rate was 7.4%. There were 4 cases of incision infection in the control group, 2 cases of respiratory tract infection, 2 cases of urinary tract infection, and the total incidence rate was 29.6%. The difference between groups was statistically significant, P0.05. In the observation group, 16 patients were satisfied with the nursing service, 10 were satisfied, 1 was not satisfied, and the total satisfaction was 96.3%. In the control group, 11 patients were satisfied with the nursing service, 10 were satisfied, 6 were not satisfied, and the total satisfaction was 77.8%. The difference between groups was statistically significant, P0.05. Conclusion: the application of grade management of hospital infection in patients with anorectal surgery is significant and worthy of clinical application and promotion.   Key words: anorectal

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档