肿瘤化疗患者肠内营养支持对患者营养状态和生活质量影响.docVIP

肿瘤化疗患者肠内营养支持对患者营养状态和生活质量影响.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
肿瘤化疗患者肠内营养支持对患者营养状态和生活质量影响

肿瘤化疗患者肠内营养支持对患者营养状态和生活质量影响   【摘要】 目的 探究肿瘤化疗患者肠内营养支持对患者营养状态和生活质量的影响。方法 160例肿瘤化疗患者, 按照随机分配原则分成对照组与观察组, 各80例。两组患者均接受常规的化疗治疗, 对照组根据患者的营养状态给出提示, 观察组给予患者肠内营养乳剂支持治疗。比较两组患者治疗后的营养状态和生活质量。结果 治疗后, 观察组的白蛋白(ALB)水平高于对照组, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组的总体主观评分法(PG-SGA)定性为A的比例为90.0%, 明显高于对照组的52.5%, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组的体质量指数(BMI)18.5 kg/m2的比例为3.8%, 明显低于对照组的20.0%, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者SF-36综合评分为(84.36±12.41)分, 明显优于对照组的(58.74±15.46)分, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 肿瘤化疗患者肠内营养支持可改善患者营养状态, 提高患者的生活质量, 可在临床中推广应用。   【关键词】 肿瘤化疗;肠内营养;营养状态;生活质量   DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.07.029   Influence by enteral nutrition support in tumor chemotherapy patients on their nutritional status and quality of life LI Ying, WANG Ji-kun, LI Wei. First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, China   【Abstract】 Objective To investigate influence by enteral nutrition support in tumor chemotherapy patients on their nutritional status and quality of life. Methods A total of 160 patients in tumor chemotherapy were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 80 cases in each group. Both groups received conventional chemotherapy, and the control group received guidance in accordance with nutritional status in patients, while the observation group received enteral nutrition emulsion support for treatment. Comparison was made on nutritional status and quality of life in patients after treatment. Results After treatment, the observation group had higher albumin (ALB) level than the control group, and their difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The observation group had proportion of qualitative A in patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) as 90.0%, which was obviously higher than 52.5% in the control group, and their difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The observation group had proportion of body mass index (BMI) 18.5 kg/m2 as 3.8%, which was much lower than 20.0% in the control group, and their difference had statistical significance (P0.05). Th

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档