观察渐进式护理应用于老年全子宫切除患者临床效果.docVIP

观察渐进式护理应用于老年全子宫切除患者临床效果.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
观察渐进式护理应用于老年全子宫切除患者临床效果

观察渐进式护理应用于老年全子宫切除患者临床效果   【摘要】 目的 观察老年全子宫切除患者采取渐进式护理干预的临床效果。方法 96例行全子宫切除术老年患者, 随机分为对照组和护理组, 每组48例。对照组采用常规护理, 护理组采用渐进式护理。分析两组术后尿管拔除、下床时间、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分、并发症率与满意度。结果 护理组术后尿管拔除、下床时间、VAS评分、SAS评分、SDS评分分别为(2.25±0.78)d、(2.53±0.59)d、(4.25±0.82)分、(53.23±6.38)分、(49.72±5.81)分;对照组分别为(3.04±0.65)d、(3.63±0.73)d、(6.01±1.17)分、(59.82±4.38)分、(52.37±4.33)分, 两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。护理组1例(2.08%)并发症发生, 对照组7例(14.58%)并发症发生;护理组48例满意, 满意度为100.00%, 对照组39例满意, 满意度为81.25%, 两组患者并发症发生率及满意度比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 对全子宫切除老年患者采用渐进式护理临床效果显著。   【关键词】 渐进式护理;老年;全子宫切除术;临床效果   DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.05.083   【Abstract】 Objective To observe the clinical effect of progressive nursing for senile patients with total hysterectomy. Methods A total of 96 senile patients with total hysterectomy were randomly divided into control group and nursing group, with 48 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing, and the nursing group received progressive nursing. Analysis were made on postoperative catheter extubation, off-bed time, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score, self-rating depression scale (SDS) score, complication rate and satisfaction between the two groups. Results The nursing group had postoperative catheter extubation, off-bed time, VAS score, SAS score and SDS score respectively as (2.25±0.78) d, (2.53±0.59) d, (4.25±0.82) points, (53.23±6.38) points and (49.72±5.81) points, which were (3.04±0.65) d, (3.63±0.73) d, (6.01±1.17) points, (59.82±4.38) points and (52.37±4.33) points in the control group, and their difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The nursing group had 1 case (2.08%) with complications, which was 7 cases (14.58%) in the control group. The nursing group had 48 satisfied cases, with satisfaction degree as 100.00%, while the control group had 39 satisfied cases, with satisfaction degree as 81.25%. Both groups had statistically significant difference in incidence of complications and sa

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档