评价心肺复苏抢救平台临床应用效果.docVIP

评价心肺复苏抢救平台临床应用效果 　　[摘要] 目的 探讨心肺复苏抢救平台的临床应用效果。 方法 对照组从2014年1月～12月，共60例心跳骤停的患者，采用普通心肺复苏方法进行抢救，观察组从2015年1月～2016年8月结束，共80例心跳骤停患者，采用心肺复苏抢救平台进行抢救，比较两组患者实施CPR时间、除颤时间、气管插管时间、静脉输液时间和抢救成功率。 结果 （1）两组心肺复苏成功率对比，观察组87.5%明显高于对照组53.33%，两组比较差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）；和对照组比较，观察组除颤时间（1.30±1.33）min、气管插管（2.60±2.61）min、静脉输液时间（125.75±28.50）s明显更短，两组比较差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。 结论 心肺复苏抢救平台的临床应用效果显著，有利于缩短抢救时间，提高抢救成功率，在心肺复苏抢救工作中发挥着重要的作用。 　　[关键词] 心肺复苏抢救平台；抢救；急诊 　　[中图分类号] R459.7 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 2095-0616（2017）05-175-03 　　[Abstract] Objective To explore the clinical application effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation rescue platform. Methods A total of 60 patients with cardiac arrest from January 2014 to December 2014 were selected as control group and treated with common cardiopulmonary resuscitation.80 cases of cardiac arrest patients from January 2015 to August 2016 were selected as observation group and treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation rescue platform.CPR time，defibrillation time，tracheal intubation time，intravenous infusion time and rescue success rate of the two groups were compared. Results （1）The success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group 53.33%，and the difference was statistically significant （P0.05）.Defibrillation time （1.30±1.33）min，tracheal intubation （2.60±2.61）min，intravenous infusion time （125.75±28.50）s of observation group were significantly shorter than those of control group，and the differences was statistically significant （P0.05）. Conclusion The clinical application effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation is significant，which is helpful to shorten the rescue time，and improve the success rate of rescue.It plays an important role in the rescue of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. 　　[Key words] Cardiopulmonary resuscitation rescue platform；Rescue；Emergency 　　心?K骤停指的是患者的心脏射血功能的突然终止，难以发现大动脉搏动，且心音消失，重要器官（如脑）发生严重缺血、缺氧等情况，严重情况下甚至会影响患者生命安全。从20世纪60年代开始，心肺复苏（CPR）在心脏骤停患者的抢救中发挥着重要的作用。现代心肺复苏的方式较多，包括人工呼吸、电击、胸外按压等，其