系统评价和meta分析质量的评价方法.pdfVIP

DOC格式论文，方便您的复制修改删减 系统评价和meta分析质量的评价方法 （作者:___________单位: ___________邮编: ___________） 作者：张俊华, 商洪才, 张伯礼 【摘要】循证医学提倡任何健康相关决策的制订均需可靠证据的支 持。系统评价是高质量证据的来源，能为临床医生、患者及其他决策 者提供重要信息，但如果评价员没有很好地掌握系统评价的方法，特 别是meta 分析使用不当，会产生存在偏倚的、甚至不正确的结论， 误导临床决策。因此，了解评价系统评价和meta 分析质量的方法， 有利于更好地使用系统评价研究的信息而不致盲从。 【关键词】系统评价; meta 分析; 质量评价, 卫生保健 基金项目: 国家十五科技攻关项目（No. 2004BA716B01）; 国家自然 科学基金项目（No. Zhang JH, Shang HC, Zhang BL. J Chin Integr Med/Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2008; 6(4): 337 340. Received January 06, 2008; published online April 15, 2008. Free full text (PDF) is available at . Indexed/abstracted in and full text link out at PubMed. Forward linking and reference linking via CrossRef. DOC格式论文，方便您的复制修改删减 DOI: 10.3736/jcipen Access How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta analysis Jun hua ZHANG, Hong cai SHANG, Bo li ZHANG 1. Evidence Based Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China 2. Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China Abstract: Evidence based medicine advocates that decision making should be based on the adequate evidence. High quality systematic review is an important source of information for clinicians, patients, governments and other decision makers in decision making. If reviewers couldn’t master the correct method of systematic review or meta analysis was misused, the inaccurate, biased or misleading outcomes would be produced. So understanding of the methods of evaluating the quality of systematic review and meta analysis is helpful to make good use of the review’s information. Keywords: systematic review; meta analysis; quality assessment, health care 系统评价（systemati