预见性复温护理在急诊多发创伤患者中的应用效果.docxVIP

预见性复温护理在急诊多发创伤患者中的应用效果.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
PAGE PAGE 1 预见性复温护理在急诊多发创伤患者中的应用效果      何东虾 卓小华 张文            [摘要]目的 探讨预见性复温护理在急诊多发创伤患者中的应用效果。方法 选取2021年1月~2021年12月我院收治的205例多发创伤患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法将其分为试验组和对照组,试验组100例,对照组105例。对照组给予常规急救护理,试验组在对照组的基础上给予预见性复温护理,比较两组入院前、入院时和入院后1 h体温变化情况,抢救成功率、寒颤、心律失常发生率和自发性低体温发生情况,自发性低体温持续时间和低体温时间累加值。结果 试验组入院时和入院后1 h体温、抢救成功率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);试验组寒颤、心律失常和自发性低体温发生率低于对照组(P0.05),试验组自发性低体温持续时间短于对照组,低体温时间累加值小于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 预见性复温护理能有效强化急救抢救流程,降低多发创伤患者自发性低体温的发生率,提高抢救成功率。   [关键词]预见性;复温护理;急诊;创伤   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the application effect of predictive rewarming nursing in patients with multiple trauma in emergency department. Methods A total of 205 patients with multiple trauma patients who were admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were selected as study subjects, the patients were divided into the experimental group and the control group according to the random number table method, 100 in the experimental group and 105 in the control group. The patients in the control group were given routine emergency nursing, and the experimental group was given predictive rewarming nursing on the basis of the control group. The changes of body temperature before and after admission and 1 hour after admission, rescue success rate, chills, arrhythmia rate and spontaneous hypothermia, spontaneous hypothermia duration and hypothermia time cumulative value between the two groups were compared. Results The body temperature and rescue success rate of the experimental group admission and 1 hour after admission were higher than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05), the incidence of chills, arrhythmia and spontaneous hypothermia in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P0.05), the duration of spontaneous hypothermia in the experimental group was shorter than that in the control group, and the cumulative value of hypothermia was smaller than that in the control group, and the differences were

文档评论(0)

简历,PPT,表格专业定制 + 关注
官方认证
服务提供商

毕业于中南财经政法大学,十二年office学习经验。 微软MOS认证专家,曾予供销社、中国银行、国家电网等企事业单位定制财务模板与PPT模板。 头条百家数十万粉丝作者,WPS稻壳儿优秀设计师。

认证主体孝感市城区墨若枫文化传媒中心
IP属地湖北
统一社会信用代码/组织机构代码
92420900MA4CKBU48M

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档