谭嗣同的墨学思想体系探究.docVIP

谭嗣同的墨学思想体系探究 目录 TOC \o 1-9 \h \z \u 目录 1 正文 1 文1：谭嗣同的墨学思想体系探究 1 一、谭嗣同早年对墨学的接受与认知转向 3 二、谭嗣同对墨学的派系划分及其理念的践行 6 三、谭嗣同对墨学的推崇与“崇奢黜俭”的提出 8 四、结语 11 文2：马克思主义人民观思想体系探究 13 参考文摘引言： 13 原创性声明（模板） 13 文章致谢（模板） 14 正文 谭嗣同的墨学思想体系探究 文1：谭嗣同的墨学思想体系探究 Abstract：　In Tan Sitongs ideological system， Mohism is not as important as Confucianism， Buddhism and Western learning， but it is also an indispeable part. Tan Sitongs acceptance of Mohism is actually his feeling and respoe to the historical and life situation. Young Tan Sitong only pays attention to the spirit of“Chivalry”and the natural science part of Mohism， and his undetanding of the spirit of“Chivalry”is limited to the life of knight errant and the ideal of Knight errant. Only when he wrote“Benevolence Theory”， did he have a more compreheive and systematic undetanding of Mohism. There are no factio in Mohism， but in Tan Sitongs view， Mohism is divided into two factio， namely“Chivalry ”and“Thinking walking”.Tan highly praised the two concepts and practiced them peonally. Apart from unconditionally submitting to Confucianism， Tan Sitong held a critical inheritance attitude towards other theories， including Mohism. Based on the coideration of developing national capitalism， he clearly expressed his disapproval of Mohisms idea of“thrift is not pleasure”， and creatively put forward the coumption concept of“advocating extravagance and depleting thrift”， which can be regarded as a tracendence of Mohism。 Keyword：　Tan Sitong; the revival of mohism; chivalrous; advocating extravagance and depleting thrift; 晚清时期墨学得以复兴， 治墨者亦随之增多， 包括梁启超、章太炎等， 其中还存在一位虽谈不上“治墨”但又与墨学有着特殊渊源的士人———谭嗣同。与梁启超、章太炎等人相比， 谭嗣同既无《墨子》的校勘着作， 也无长篇论述墨学思想的着述问世， 其对墨学的叙述大多散见于《仁学》当中。严格来说， 谭嗣同对墨学更多地只是一种认知和推崇， 而非研究。不过， 谭嗣同虽较少从学理层面研读墨学， 但其对墨家“任侠”精神的践行和对墨学的推崇则非梁启超、章太炎等所能及。学术界目前对梁启超、章太炎、胡适等人的墨学研究关注较多， 而对谭嗣同与墨学的关系则甚少涉及1， 这与墨学与谭嗣同之间的特殊关联不无关系。从谭嗣同甚少的叙述中探寻其与墨学的关系， 似乎本身即存在着建构之嫌， 但毕竟谭嗣同以身殉难之举和“崇墨贬儒”的倾向等都表露出了相当明显的墨学渊源， 加之其在晚清思想史上的特殊地位， 探寻谭氏烈士精神背后的墨学因素亦显得相当必要。 在不同层次的概念