On the end of moral ideals and Education State Ethics stick to the bottom line - the Paradox of Educational Thought of Rousseau and Enlightenment.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 20 On the end of moral ideals and Education State Ethics stick to the bottom line - the Paradox of Educational Thought of Rousseau and Enlightenment Paper Keywords: Rousseau’s natural education ethical bottom line Paradox Paper Abstract: Analysis of Rousseau’s noble education, tolerance to why teachers have, children and teachers in special cases of central tendency and the natural education is, between the concept of nationalism contradictions of education and other issues, found that both his mouth paradox Chen , as in the pursuit of high moral ideals claim there is a certain degree of “parent-type authoritarian” tendencies. Even so, their education has given us to bear important lesson: education in the pursuit of high-profile positive freedom, it must be adhere to the “do no harm” ethical bottom line. Rousseau is a thinker, there is a huge controversy. Rousseau, Kant is correct that ignorance of his contempt for the masses, so he learned to respect people. “Some philosophers believe that Rousseau is potentially authoritarian tendencies, and even that “From Rousseau era, since that is a reformer who has always been divided into two groups, namely, his followers and those who follow Locke. ... ... Hitler was a result of Rousseau; Roosevelt and Churchill are the result of Locke.” Relative to the political philosophy of Rousseau, we have compared their educational Thought of the flat, thinking of the negative aspects of their attention is not enough. Rousseau’s natural education on the one hand the positive affirmation, it will certainly human nature, the moral ideal of the pursuit of natural purity, brings to the entire educational thinking positive “Copernican revolution.” On the other hand, can not be ignored, in strong feelings of moral redemption under the impetus of educational thought of Rousseau and inherently implicit morality of violence, education, the seeds of violence. First, the paradox of educational