Higher legal education the choice of direction and teaching methods-毕业论文翻译.docVIP

Higher legal education the choice of direction and teaching methods-毕业论文翻译.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Higher legal education the choice of direction and teaching methods-毕业论文翻译

Higher legal education the choice of direction and teaching methods Abstract: The implementation of a unified national judicial examination, to improve access to the threshold of the legal profession is China’s judicial reform a major move. Of personnel in raising the level of China’s judiciary and the promotion of democracy and the rule of law has an important significance to the direction of higher legal education will inevitably have a significant impact. Based on this, to change the traditional “spoon-fed” the teaching methods and examination scores to Heroes model, students can choose to implement an independent analysis to solve practical problems of teaching methods is an inevitable requirement. Keywords:: unified national judicial examination; legal education; teaching methods In July 2001, the 22nd meeting of the NPC Standing Committee revised the “Law of the People’s Republic of judges” and the “Law of the People’s Republic Prosecutor”, modify the content of mainly served as a judge, served as a prosecutor from the adoption of a unified judicial examination and achieve qualifications were selected. Subsequently, the Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued Notice No. 1, decided to no longer be a separate organization served as a judge, served as a prosecutor and the bar exam, beginning in 2002 to implement a unified national judicial examination. This is the reform of our justice system, a good start, in the current system of judicial reform, the level of difficulty in the case of a breakthrough could be a breakthrough in the reform of the judicial system. Meanwhile, the direction of China’s higher education law and teaching methods will also have the choice of major and far-reaching impact. First, why do we need a unified China National Judicial Examination First, the direct purpose or short-term goal should be to increase the legal profession, especially judges and prosecuto

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

hhuiws1482 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5024214302000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档