国际体育仲裁院《体育仲裁规则》第58条释义.pdfVIP

文章编号:1002-9826(2014)04-0124一07 pzifZLmTEmNOLm 国际体育仲裁院〈体育仲裁规则〉第 58 条束手义 Explanatioos 00 the R58 of CAS Code 杨磊 YANG Lei 摘 要:国际体育仲裁院 2013 年新版仲裁规则对于第 58 条的修订，以及以往国际体育仲裁 院的仲裁实践表明了体育规则的适用不以当事人的选择为必要条件，具有适用的必然性与 优先性;体育组织所在地国法的适用前提，是当事人没有选择国家法;仲裁庭在适用其所认 为可适用的法律时，应当说明理由。现有第 58 条的设直具有一定的合理性，但也存在亟待 完善之处，从微观而言，需要进一步精确第 58 条的文本含义，从宏观而言，CAS 仲裁庭本身 需要严谨对待裁决书法律适用部分的表述，以避免造成误读。我国在自身的体育法治建设 以及仲裁规则的构建时，也应充分考虑体育规则与国家法的适用关系、当事人意思自治的范 罔与作用大小以及仲裁庭自由裁量的规范等问题。 关键词:国际体育仲裁院;((体育仲裁规则));第 58 条 Abstract: Both the modification of R58 in the new edition of CAS Code 2013 and the past practice of CAS , indicate that the application of regulation has some necessity and priority , and it is not based on the choice of the parties; the prerequisite to apply the the law of the country in which the federation ,association or sports-related body which has issued the challenged de- cision is domiciled is that the parties do not have a choice on national law; the panel shall give the reason when apply the rules of law it deems appropriate. R58 has certain rationality as well as some aspects to be improved , such as the wording of R58 need to be used more strictly , and the panel should treat the part of applicable law in the awards in a more rigorous way. It is also very important for us to consider the problems of the relationship between the application of regulation and national law;