奥林花园一期工程“黑白合同”案案例分析-case analysis of.docxVIP

AbstractInrecentyears,theblackandwhitecontractoccurrencefrequently,betweenemployerandcontractortwocontractssignedoftenoccur,whichdamagesthelegitimaterightsandinterestsothersandsocialpublicinterests,resultinginthelossofstatepropertyinawasteofsocialresources.Butintherapiddevelopmentofcityoftoday,biddingbecominguniversal,scarcityandnon-renewablelandresourcesatthesametime,plustheunique,notnormativeandbiddinginengineeringconstructionbiddingbehavior,relatedbiddingpersonnelusetheconveniencetocircumventlawsorregulationsofthebank,signedthecontractinblackandwhitefactshaveoccurredfromtimetotimeandgrowing.Althoughthiskindofillegalbehaviormayhavelegalconsequencesareespeciallyserious,butincreasedthetransactionrisk,causingthelossofsocialwealth,andcausedbadinfluenceinthesociety.Toguardagainsttherisk,shouldbeinthepracticeoftrialofitsqualitativeandeffectivenesscorrectly,toseektruthfromfacts.Theblackandwhitecontractphenomenonintheprocessoftheconstructionofmanythattheuncertainty,thereisalotofdebate,thathowtoaffirmthevalidityofthisphenomenon?TheauthortriestoanalysisthroughaphaseoftheprojectOlingardenblack-and-whitecontractcase.Inadditiontotheintroduction,thispapermainlywritesfromthefivepartsofthecaseanalysis:ThefirstpartisthemeritsIntroduction,describestheoriginofthecaseaswellastheoccurrenceofthewholestory.Thesecondpartisthecaseofthedispute.Throughrefiningcasefact,theauthormainlysummedupthefocusofcontroversy：thecontractorandtheemployercompanyBinaccordancewiththetenderdocumentsandthebiddocuments,theconstructioncontract,letalonebythecontractorundertakingisvalid.LettheletterofcommitmentcommitmenttobesignificantRanglitourbanconstruction,structureofengineeringpricechanges,theprofitsshouldberegardedasundertakingtodeterminetheconstructioncostbasis.Thethirdpartisthekeycontentofthisthesis,mainlyanalyzesthefocusofcontroversy.Legalnaturethroughanalyzingtheparticularityofblackandwhitecontractthiscontractinblackandwhite;accordingtotheblackcontracttowhitecontractcontentchangestotheinitialdefinitionof