尚秉和 虞翻《易》学思想比较研究-a comparative study of shang binghe and yu fans thoughts on yi.docxVIP

  • 7
  • 0
  • 约5.29万字
  • 约 66页
  • 2018-07-31 发布于上海
  • 举报

尚秉和 虞翻《易》学思想比较研究-a comparative study of shang binghe and yu fans thoughts on yi.docx

尚秉和 虞翻《易》学思想比较研究-a comparative study of shang binghe and yu fans thoughts on yi

尚秉和、虞翻《易》学思想比较研究h胁中国哲学专业研究生:李利指碍教师:黄升闺11,.摘要:(易》学在中国哲学的地位颇为重要。经学以《易》为六经之首,历史上对《易》的研究主要分象数均义现两派,两派立论不同,互有攻评。尚秉和、虞翻工人鼠同在象数派阵营,但也各有自己的解《易》理论。虞翻之说,多为后世所法,而近代象数《易》学大家尚秉和却对虞翻之《易》说多有驳斥。虞翻以卦变说解《易}),把各卦的卦交辞联系起来解释《易》之经传,对后世象数派影响极大。而尚荣和先生以易理解《易》之阴阳,先后天卦位台用、发明《易》取象之法,解决了很多象的难题。本文将从《易》的学派问题,象数《易》的演变,象数解《易》诸体例,工人《易》学思想,二人解《易》的不同方式等方面,加以分析比较,进而对工人理论中不足之处等方面做以研究探讨。关键询:虞翻尚策和卦变先后天卦位唰呻叫n叫u川川川,,州川川RJV唰州州RJW唰唰,,川川川00阳阳m川a--恻Y¥主WF曲‘也TheComparisonBetweenShangbinhesThouthtand,_YufansThoughtAboutYiMajor:ChinesephilosophyGraduate:LiLiTutor:HuangKai部Abstract:ThesωdyofyiisVI町,importantinChinesePhilosophy.yìis也eheadofthesixConfucianismclassicsTherearemainlytwofactionsinthestudyofyi,image翩numb町也ctionandmora1s-principlefactio咄咄ofthem也inkthemselvωinfa1lible,criticizing也eoppositefaction.ShangbinheandYufanarebothinimage-numberfa侃侃,theyhave由eirown也oughtaboutyi.1otsofscholar也inkYufa的也eoryisright,ButShangbinhe白inkYufans也ω叩iswrong.Yufanrelated64divinationsymbolωeachoth吼heexplainedyi怕也ewayofdivinationsymbolchanging,whichinfluencedlotsofscholar.Shangbinheexplainedyiindiffi町entwa弘he白iught抖nandyangcannotseparatedfromeach0也盹usingxiantianandhoutiandivinationsymbolpositionboth,solv创manyimagesdifficultproblems.Thisarticlestudyforyis:fi部悦。时,thechangeofimage-numb町faction,也eMethodsofimage-numb町faction,也edifferentbetweenShangbingheandYufans由oug恤,thedetici舰lciesintheir伽ωry.Keywords:YufanShangbinhedivinationsymbolchangingxiantianandhoutiandivinationsymbolposition日市够、目录L...缩论…..............….........…...................….......………........….......…………..........…………..1…、汉《易》学的传却是演变…………·………………………………………………............ι(…)氟数与术数之别…….……...…....……..…....……....…....…………….(二)汉代之前《易》之学班问题……..….川.....…H…………....…..川….…....…..川….川..…....………川..…...……....……...5c.::.)汉代《易》掌之阴阳灾3蛮E成分变化原因分析.…….川…..川….川..……………………7(四)靡翻《易》注中不存灾异说的原因………....................…………....………….....9〈丑)蔬薯之《鹦》与虞翻、尚靠和之《易》学提系………..1.孟氏《易》之今古文……..……...…..…….....…川.…....2.孟氏《易》二之t今古义……...….....…....……....……..……...3孟jE喜《易》之归属……...……....…....…….…...………川..…...……....….川.……...

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档