- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
保守治疗与手术治疗老年桡骨远端骨折效果对比分析
保守治疗与手术治疗老年桡骨远端骨折的效果对比分析
【摘要】 目的 ?Ρ确治霰J刂瘟朴胧质踔瘟评夏觇愎窃抖斯钦鄣牧俅仓瘟菩Ч?及安全性。方法 老年桡骨远端骨折患者68例, 随机分成对照组及观察组, 每组34例。对照组使用手法复位的保守治疗, 观察组患者使用切开复位内固定的手术治疗, 治疗后随访12个月, 比较两组患者骨折愈合时及术后12个月
Cooney评分、骨折愈合后桡骨掌倾角、尺偏角、桡骨缩短以及术后并发症的发生情况。结果 观察组患者骨折愈合时Cooney评分为(86.2±5.9)分, 高于对照组的(68.7±5.2)分(t=12.975, P0.05)。观察组患者骨折愈合后桡骨掌倾角(9.7±2.2)°, 高于对照组的(5.8±2.4)°, 差异具有统计学意义(t=6.985, P0.05)。结论 老年桡骨远端骨折使用手术治疗能够得到更优秀的功能复位及早期复位, 但是保守治疗与手术治疗均可以达到骨折远期功能恢复的效果, 安全性确切。
【关键词】 保守治疗;手术治疗;桡骨远端骨折;老年人
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.05.021
Comparative analysis of effects by conservative treatment and surgical treatment in the treatment of senile distal radius fracture XU Yang. Department of Orthopedics, Shenyang City Tiexi District Huakang Hospital, Shenyang 110026, China
【Abstract】 Objective To comparatively analyze clinical effects and safety by conservative treatment and surgical treatment in the treatment of senile distal radius fracture. Methods A total of 68 senile distal radius fracture patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 34 cases in each group. The control group received conservative treatment by manual reduction, and the observation group received surgical treatment by open reduction and internal fixation. Follow-up lasted for 12 months after treatment. Comparison was made on Cooney score after fracture healing and in postoperative 12 months, radial palmar inclination, ulnar inclination, radial shortening and postoperative complications between the two groups. Results The observation group had higher Cooney score after fracture healing as (86.2±5.9) points than (68.7±5.2) points in the control group (t=12.975, P0.05). The observation group had Cooney score in postoperative 12 months as (94.9±5.2) points,
which was (94.5±5.0) points in the control group, and their difference had no statistical significance (t=0.323, P0.05). The observation group had higher radial palmar inclination after fracture healing as (9.7±2.2)° than (5.8±2.4)° in the contr
原创力文档


文档评论(0)