TRIPS协议第四十条下的滥用专利权规制研究-法律专业论文.docx

上海交通大学硕士学位论文 上海交通大学硕士学位论文 摘 摘 要 万方数据 万方数据 万方数据 万方数据 TRIPS 时的关系，进而对 TRIPS 第 40 条展开叙述。第四章首先介绍了 我国立法机关在滥用专利权上的立法现状，根据中国在签订 TRIPS 时的 历史背景和当前在世界上的地位，对这些年的法规稍加分析，然后根据 中国的当前科技研发能力给出滥用专利权的规制建议，并对中国日后的 立法趋势加以展望。 TRIPS 协议中关于利用专利权扭曲贸易程序的规定已经为各个成员 规制专利滥用设定了大致的制度框架。相应地，我国应该在 TRIPS 协议 的框架下进一步完善专利权滥用的法规，以优化我国垄断法和反不正当 竞争法在知识产权问题上的制度。在反垄断法对知识产权滥用的规制上， 一定要根据中国的自身工业研发体系的现状来决定是否应该借鉴发达国 家和地区的立法，从而进一步决定专利权滥用与反垄断法的关系，到底 滥用专利权是相关权利主体违反反垄断法的前提还是结果，才能避免日 后以反垄断法规制知识产权滥用走入误区。 关键词 专利权 权利滥用 反垄断 许可 IV A RESEARCH ON PATENT ABUSE AND RELATED REGULATION WITH THE PERSPECTIVE OF CLAUSE 40 OF TRIPS ABSTRACT TRIPS is an international agreement that can mostly reflect the opposition which exists between the developing and developed countries in international trade of intellectual property rights. However, how developing countries should legislate in accordance with his own interests on the premise of TRIPS Agreement is a very complex problem. Therefore, this paper intends to sort out the history of the execution of TRIPS and research various countries in the practice of domestic legislation of abuse on patent, so as to clarify the connotation and denotation of this concept, and the related impact for a country, which can serve as a prospective predict for our countrys legislation. Compared with other current civil research on this topic, the non-obviousness of this paper is as follow: Firstly, this paper not only conducts an analysis from civil legislation, but also conducts an analysis on effect of patent abuse on economics of a country, and makes a research on V 上海交通大学法律硕士论文 上海交通大学法律硕士论文 摘 摘 要 the relation between developing and developed countries on the background of the execution of TRIPS; secondly, based on the legislation experience of Europe, US, Japan, Taiwan and Germany, this paper make a forecast for the future relevant legislation on patent abuse in China. The paper mainly comprises the introduction, the text and conclusions, whereinthe text consists of four chapters: The first chapter