左右空间情感效价的分析——基于极性差异假说-analysis of emotional titles in left and right spaces —— based on polar difference hypothesis.docxVIP

摘要 摘要 万方数据 万方数据 差异假说。 关键词：左右空间情感效价，具身认知，躯体特异性假说，极性差异假说 II Abst Abstract Abstract Emotion has alaways been the hotspot of the research in psychology. Emotion, as an abstract concept, is often associated with specific conceptes or things, with the culture, language and customs of deep statements, such as, the spatial position and emotion. The current researchs of space affective valence is mainly on two theories: one is the conceptual metephor theory, and the other is embodied cognition theory. The relationship between emotion and vertiacl space is explained by conceptual metaphor; While the embodied cognition theory, especially the body-specificity hypothesis, focusing on the emotional relationship with the horizontal space. This research mainly studies the relationship between the horizontal space and emotion, and it’s called left-right space affective valence. According to the differences polarity hypothesis, we try to use this hypothesis to explain the different reaction to left-right space affective valence. In addition, we will explore what are factors influence peoples reactions to left-right space affective valence. In the first experiment, enotional cartoon pictures, being different from the previous experimental materials, are utilized to examine the results of previous research (right means good and left means bad for Right-handedness vs left means good and right means bad for Left-handedness). The results suggest that the effects, “right means good and left means bad for Right-handedness” vs “left means good and right means bad for Left-handedness”, is not constant. We found that both Left-handedness and Right-handedness are not affected by location，when they identify the happy faces. However the sad faces are identified more quickly when they are presented LEFT rather than RIGHT by Right-handedness, happy faces are identified equally whether they are presented LEFT or RIGHT. As well as , we found that polarity-based perspective offer a