微柱凝胶卡式法在临床安全输血中应用价值.docVIP

微柱凝胶卡式法在临床安全输血中应用价值.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
微柱凝胶卡式法在临床安全输血中应用价值

微柱凝胶卡式法在临床安全输血中应用价值   [摘要] 目的 观察微柱凝胶卡式法在临床安全输血中的应用价值。 方法 收集送检的2013年2月~2014年2月有妊娠史、输血史需接受输血治疗的500例患者作为研究对象,于输血前采用微柱凝胶卡式法进行抗体筛查,并与抗人球蛋白反应结果进行比较。 结果 500例患者中,抗体检测阳性8例,阳性率为1.6%,其中自身抗体阳性2例(25.0%);Rh血型系统抗体阳性5例(62.5%),其中抗-E阳性4例,抗-Ce联合抗体阳性1例;抗-Lea阳性1例(12.5%)。直接抗人球蛋白实验阳性10例,阳性率为2.00%,微柱凝胶抗人球蛋白试验和传统抗人球蛋白实验结果比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 不规则抗体筛查是保障输血安全性的重要措施,且相较传统输血方案而言,微柱凝胶卡卡式法是安全输血的最优方案,可降低溶血性输血反应发生率,提高输血的安全性,有较高的临床应用价值。   [关键词] 输血;微柱凝胶卡式法;安全;交叉配血;不规则抗体   [中图分类号] R457.1+2 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2015)02(a)-0132-03   Application value of micro-column gel test method in clinical safe blood transfusion   LIU Fang   Blood Center of Fuxin City in Liaoning Province,Fuxin 123000,China   [Abstract] Objective To observe the application value of micro-column gel test method in clinical safe blood transfusion. Methods 500 eaaminated patients needing to receive the blood transfusion treatment having pregnancy history,history of blood transfusion from February 2013 to February 2014 were collected as the study subjects,and they were given antibody screening using micro-column gel test,and the results were compared with antiglobulin reaction results. Results Among 500 patients antibody test of 8 patients was positive,the positive rate was 1.6%, and among them there were 2 cases (25.0%) with positive auto-antibody;there were 5 cases (62.5%) with positive Rh blood group antibody,among 5 cases,anti-E test of 4 cases was positive,anti-Ce combination antibody of 1 case was positive;anti-Lea of 1 case (12.5%) was positive.Direct antiglobulin test was positive in 10 cases,the positive rate was 2.0%,and there was no statistical difference of the results of micro-column gel antihuman globulin and traditional antihuman globulin,(P0.05). Conclusion The irregular antibody screening is an important measure to ensure the safety of blood transfusion and the micro-column gel test method is the best plan for the safety of transfusion compared with the traditional blood transfusion program.This method ca

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档