心理护理干预对恶性肿瘤放疗患者心理影响分析.docVIP

心理护理干预对恶性肿瘤放疗患者心理影响分析 　　[摘要] 目的 探讨心理护理干预措施对恶性肿瘤放疗患者的心理状况影响。方法 选取我院2012年1月～2013年12月间的120例恶性肿瘤放疗患者为研究对象，将其按照随机数字法分为常规组和干预组，常规组给予常规的护理，干预组给予心理护理干预，观察两组患者的心理状况。结果 护理前两组的SAS评分和SDS评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P0.05）；护理后两组的SAS评分和SDS评分较护理前有明显改善，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。干预组的临床护理满意度为93.3%，常规组的临床护理满意度为72.7%，干预组的临床护理满意度高于常规组，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。干预组患者生活质量评分为（86.3±3.2）分，常规组患者生活质量评分为（73.4±2.5）分，干预组患者生活质量评分高于常规组，差异有统计学有意义（P0.05）。 结论 在恶性肿瘤放疗患者护理的过程中加强针对性的心理护理干预是可行的，且有效改善患者不良情绪。同时，对提高患者的临床护理满意度也具有明显的优势，提高患者放疗后的生活质量，值得临床应用与推广。 　　[关键词] 恶性肿瘤；心理护理；心理状况；应用效果 　　[中图分类号] R473.73 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701（2014）23-0078-03 　　[Abstract] Objective To investigate the psychological care interventions for cancer radiotherapy psychological status of patients. Methods A total of 120 cases of cancer in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2013 treated with radiotherapy were selected for the study， which was in accordance with randomly divided into routine group and intervention group and the conventional group received routine care， the intervention group received psychological nursing intervention， the two groups were observed psychological conditions. Results The intervention group and conventional care group SAS scores and SDS scores showed no significant difference（P0.05）； After nursing， intervention group and the conventional group of former SAS score and SDS score significantly were higher than before nursing differences were statistically significant（P0.05）. Satisfaction with clinical care of patients in the intervention group was 93.3%， satisfaction with routine clinical care of patients was 72.7%， satisfaction with clinical care of patients in the intervention group was higher than the conventional group of patients in clinical nursing satisfaction（P0.05）. Quality of life scores of patients in the intervention group were（86.3±3.2） points， routine quality of life scores for the group of patients （73.4±2.5）points. Quality of life scores of patients in the intervention group were higher than the conventional gro