- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
心理护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭患者焦虑抑郁情绪影响
心理护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭患者焦虑抑郁情绪影响
[摘要] 目的 探讨心理护理干预对慢性肾功能衰竭患者焦虑抑郁情绪的影响。 方法 选择2016年1~12月在我院治疗的60例慢性肾功能衰竭患者为研究对象。随机分为干预组与对照组各30例。干预组给予心理护理干预,对照组给予常规护理。比较两组干预前后SDS以及SAS评分。 结果 两组干预后SAS评分均较干预前低,干预前后比较差异显著(P0.05);干预组干预后SAS评分较对照组低,两组差异显著(P0.05)。干预后两组SDS评分均较干预前低,干预前后比较差异显著(P0.05);干预组干预后SDS评分较对照组低,两组比较差异显著(P0.05)。 结论 慢性肾功能衰竭患者实施心理护理干预能缓解焦虑抑郁情绪,值得临床推广。
[关键词] 心理护理干预;慢性肾功能衰竭;焦虑;抑郁
[中图分类号] R473.74 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 2095-0616(2017)16-172-04
Effect of psychological nursing intervention on anxiety and depression in patients with chronic renal failure
ZHAO Yudan1 GAO Sisi2 CHEN Shuang3 YU Jing1
1. Department of Nephrology, Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang 157000, China; 2. Department of Endocrinology, Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang 157000, China; 3.Hemodialysis Center, Mudanjiang Medical University Hongqi Hospital, Mudanjiang 157000, China
[Abstract] Objective To discuss the effect of psychological nursing intervention on anxiety and depression in patients with chronic renal failure. Methods 60 cases with chronic renal failure from Jan to Dec 2016 were selected as objects. All cases were randomly divided into the intervention group and the control group, each of 30 cases. The intervention group received psychological nursing intervention, and the control group received routine nursing. SDS and SAS before and after intervention of two groups were compared. Results After intervention, SAS sores of two groups were lower than those before intervention, and the difference showed significant difference(P0.05); After intervention, SAS score of the intervention group was lower than that of the control group, and the difference showed significant difference(P0.05). After intervention, SDS sores of two groups were lower than those before intervention, and the difference showed significant difference(P0.05); After intervention, SDS score of the intervention group was lower than that of the control group,
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 西南18J112 墙标准图集.pdf VIP
- 2025-2026学年高一上学期《树立正确三观:从庞众望的成长看青春担当》主题班会课件.pptx
- 北京市海淀区2024~2025学年七年级上学期期中考试数学试卷.docx
- 2025电力数据资产管理体系白皮书.docx VIP
- 《运动神经元病》课件.pptx VIP
- 肾上腺皮质腺瘤护理查房.pptx VIP
- 药物制剂生产实训(初级)课件 2-2 PPT:人员卫生管理.pptx
- 三年(2023-2025)中考历史真题分类汇编:专题07 统一多民族国家的巩固与发展·选择题(全国通用)(解析版).docx VIP
- 环境工程原理课件.pptx VIP
- 5_1_名雅化工不饱和聚脂树脂腻子(原子灰)MSDS.docx VIP
文档评论(0)