氧驱动雾化吸入和空气压缩泵雾化吸入在小儿喘息中疗效对比研究.docVIP

氧驱动雾化吸入和空气压缩泵雾化吸入在小儿喘息中疗效对比研究 　　[摘要] 目的 ?Ρ妊跚?动雾化吸入和空气压缩泵雾化吸入在小儿喘息治疗的临床效果。 方法 选取 2014年1月～2016年5月本院儿科收治的小儿支气管哮喘160例作为研究对象，随机将其分为对照组与观察组各80例，两组患儿均给予相同药物雾化吸入治疗，对照组采用空气泵雾化吸入方法，观察组应用氧驱动雾化吸入方式，观察两组患儿治疗前后血氧饱和度（SaO2），分别记录两组患儿治疗期间的胸闷咳喘、反复喘息及呼吸困难等临床症状的消失时间，并进行统计学分析。 结果 两组患者治疗后SaO2明显高于治疗前，且两组比较差异有统计学意义（P0.05）；观察组患者治疗后SaO2明显高于对照组治疗后，且两组比较差异有统计学意义（P0.05）；观察组患儿咳嗽缓解时间、喘息缓解时间、肺部??音消失时间、住院时间均显著低于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）；观察组总有效率为96.25%，高于对照组的86.25%，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。 结论 氧驱动雾化吸入治疗方式具有起效迅速与疗效显著等临床优势，可广泛推广应用。 　　[关键词] 小儿支气管哮喘；氧驱动雾化吸入；空气压缩泵雾化吸入；血氧饱和度 　　[中图分类号] R725.6 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 2095-0616（2017）10-56-04 　　Comparative study on curative effect of oxygen atomizing inhalation and air compress pump atomizing inhalation in treatment of pediatric asthma 　　SUN Xingkui 　　Department of Pediatrics，Haifeng Pengpai Jinian Hospital，Haifeng 516400，China 　　[Abstract] Objective To evaluate the clinical curative effect of oxygen atomizing inhalation and air compress pump atomizing inhalation in treatment of pediatric asthma. Methods 160 patients with pediatric bronchial asthma who were admitted to department of pediatrics from January 2014 to May 2016 were selected as research objects and they were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group， with 80 in each.Children in two groups were all given atomizing inhalation of the same drug.The control group was given air compress pump atomizing inhalation while the observation group was given oxygen atomizing inhalation.Blood oxygen saturation （SaO2） before and after treatment of children in two groups was compared.Disappearing time of clinical symptoms such as chest distress，cough and asthma，recurrent wheezing，dyspnea and so on were respectively recorded and statistically analyzed. Results SaO2 after treatment of patients in two groups was significantly higher than that before treatment and comparative difference was statistically significant （P 　　[Key words] Pediatric bronchial asthma；Oxygen atomization inhalation；Air compress pump a