透明帽辅助法降低结直肠息肉漏诊率对照研究.docVIP

透明帽辅助法降低结直肠息肉漏诊率对照研究.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
透明帽辅助法降低结直肠息肉漏诊率对照研究

透明帽辅助法降低结直肠息肉漏诊率对照研究   【摘要】 目的 评估透明帽辅助法对降低结直肠息肉漏诊率的可行性及安全性。方法 100例接受同次两遍“串联式”肠镜检查的健康体检者, 随机分为试验组和对照组, 各50例。试验组第一遍采用透明帽辅助结肠镜检查+第二遍常规结肠镜检查;对照组两遍均采用常规结肠镜检查。比较两组操作时间、息肉检出率、息肉漏诊率及不良事件发生率。结果 试验组第一遍肠镜检查的进镜时间为(263.22±92.06)s, 短于对照组的(304.84±109.87)s, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。试验组息肉患者漏诊率为12.00%(6/50), 低于对照组的34.00%(17/50), 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。试验组患者息肉漏诊率为12.16%(9/74), 低于对照组的29.17%(21/72), 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 透明帽辅助技术是一种降低肠镜检查息肉漏诊、缩短进镜时间且安全、廉价的方法, 值得临床推广使用。   【关键词】 结直肠息肉;结肠镜;透明帽辅助法;漏诊率   DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.02.006   Control study on foresight of transparent cap auxiliary method in decreasing missed diagnosis rate in colorectal polyps WU Jin-feng, CHEN Ke-yun, LIU Jin-tao, et al. Shenzhen City Louhu District People’s Hospital, Shenzhen 518001, China   【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate feasibility and security of transparent cap auxiliary method in decreasing missed diagnosis rate in colorectal polyps. Methods A total of 100 health examination people receiving tandem colonoscopy examination two times were randomly divided into experimental group and control gorup, with 50 cases in each group. The experimental group received transparent cap auxiliary examination for the first time + conventional colonoscopy examination for the second time, and the control group received conventional colonoscopy examination for two times. Comparison were made on operating time, polyp detection rate, missed diagnosis rate of polyp and incidence of adverse events in two groups. Results The experimental group had colonoscopy entering time as (263.22±92.06)s, which wa shorter than (304.84±109.87)s in the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The experimental group had lower missed diagnosis rate as 12.00% (6/50) than 34.00% (17/50) in the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The experimental group had lower missed diagnosis rate of polyps as 12.16% (9/74) than 29.17% (21/72) in the control group, and the difference had statistical

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档