- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
超声造影在肝硬化合并小肝癌中早期诊断价值
超声造影在肝硬化合并小肝癌中早期诊断价值
[摘要] 目的 探讨超声造影在肝硬化合并小肝癌中的早期诊断价值。 方法 收集本院收治的经术后病理学诊断的80例肝硬化合并小肝癌患者的临床资料,将超声造影应用于患者的早期诊断之中。不同分化程度癌超声造影时间分析、增强CT与超声造影诊断率比较、造影前后超声诊断评分比较。 结果 (1)高分化癌与中-低分化癌在开始增强时间、增强峰值时间方面的差异均无统计学意义(P0.05),高分化癌开始消退时间显著高于中-低分化癌(P0.05);(2)本研究中,运用增强CT检查的患者,诊断正确的有65例,诊断准确率为81.25%(65/80);运用超声造影检查的患者,诊断正确的有74例,诊断准确率为92.50%(74/80)。增强CT检查诊断准确率显著低于超声造影诊断正确率(P0.05);(3)本组80例患者造影后超声评分状况显著优于超声造影前(P0.05)。 结论 超声造影在肝硬化合并小肝癌中的早期诊断准确率较高,具有较高的临床应用价值。
[关键词]超声造影;肝硬化合并小肝癌;肝硬化再生结节;早期诊断价值
[中图分类号] R575.2;R735.7 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 2095-0616(2017)15-132-03
[Abstract]Objective To investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in early diagnosis of liver cirrhosis combined with small hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Methods The clinical data of 80 patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with small hepatocellular carcinoma after operation were collected, contrast-enhanced ultrasound was applied in patients with early diagnosis. The different degree of differentiation of cancer ultrasound contrast time was analyzed, The enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnosis rate were compared, and the ultrasonic diagnostic score before and after contrastwas compared. Results (1) The difference of high differentiation and moderate to low differentiation cancer in the beginning of enhanced time and enhanced peak time were not statistically significant (P0.05). The high differentiation began to subside time was significantly higher than in low differentiation cancer (P0.05). (2) In this study, patients with enhanced CT were diagnosed correctly with a diagnosis of accuracy of 81.25% (65/80) in all cases. There were 74 cases diagnosed correctly by contrast-enhanced ultrasound, the diagnostic accuracy was 92.50% (74/80). The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT was significantly lower than that of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (P0.05). (3) The ultrasound score of the patients after angiography in this group was significantly better than that of before contrast-enhanced
文档评论(0)