阿奇霉素与头孢西丁治疗盆腔支原体感染临床效果对比分析.docVIP

阿奇霉素与头孢西丁治疗盆腔支原体感染临床效果对比分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
阿奇霉素与头孢西丁治疗盆腔支原体感染临床效果对比分析

阿奇霉素与头孢西丁治疗盆腔支原体感染临床效果对比分析   【摘要】目的:探讨支原体感染盆腔炎患者应用阿奇霉素治疗的临床效果及安全性。方法:按随机数字表法将我院2012年8月至2014年8月收治的140例支原体感染盆腔炎患者分为对照组和观察组,每组70例。两组患者均在给予盆腔炎2号方的同时联合其他药物治疗,其中对照组联合头孢西丁治疗,观察组联合阿奇霉素治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效和不良反应发生率。结果:观察组痊愈51例,显效11例,有效6例,无效2例,治疗总有效率为9714%;对照组痊愈32例,显效13例,有效12例,无效13例,治疗总有效率为8143%,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P005)。观察组的子宫血流动力学指标均高于对照组,比较差异具有统计学意义(P005)。观察组的不良反应发生率为714%;对照组为2857%,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P005)。结论:支原体感染盆腔炎患者应用阿奇霉素治疗的临床疗效较好,不良反应也较少,具有临床推广价值。   【关键词】盆腔炎;支原体感染;阿奇霉素;头孢西丁   The effect of azithromycin combined cefoxitin in the treatment of pelvic inflammation caused by mycoplasma infectionYANG Xinwei1, TANG Fei 2△. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The 2nd People’s Hospital of Yichang, Hubei 443000, China; 2. Department of Pharmacy, Huangshi Central Hospital, Huangshi 435000, China   【Abstract】Objectives: To investigate the clinical effect and safety of azithromycin combined cefoxitin in treating pelvic inflammation patients with mycoplasma infection. Methods: 140 pelvic inflammation patients with mycoplasma infection in our hospital from August 2012 to August 2014 were selected and randomly divided into control group and observation group, 70 cases in each group. Besides the second therapy for pelvic inflammation, the control group jointly received cefoxitin and the observation group received azithromycin for treatment. The clinical efficacy and incidence rate of adverse reaction in the two groups were compared. Results: In the observation group, there were 51 cases cured, 11 cases markedly effective, 6 cases effective, and 2 cases invalid, the total efficiency of treatment being 97.14%; in the control group there were 32 cases cured, 13 cases markedly effective, 12 cases effective and 13 cases invalid, the total efficiency of treatment being 81.43%, with statistically significant differences between the two groups (P005). The uterine hemodynamics indexes in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, with statistically significant difference (P0

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档