髋关节置换术治疗老年移位型股骨颈骨折患者的效果观察（基础医学范文）.docVIP

髋关节置换术治疗老年移位型股骨颈骨折患者的效果观察（基础医学范文） 目录 TOC \o 1-9 \h \z \u 目录 1 正文 1 文1：髋关节置换术治疗老年移位型股骨颈骨折患者的效果观察 2 1.1一般资料 3 1.2手术方法 4 1.3观察指标 4 1.4统计学分析 4 2.1两组患者术中出血量、手术时间及住院时间的比较 5 2.2两组患者术后远期并发症发生率和术后再手术率的比较 5 2.3两组患者术后髋关节功能的比较 5 文2：髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折20例疗效观察 9 1 资料与方法 9 1.1 一般资料 9 1.2 病例入选标准 10 1.3 方法 10 1.4 观察指标 10 1.5 评定标准 10 2 结果 11 2.1 围术期一般情况 11 2.2 术后髋关节功能恢复情况 11 2.3 术后并发症情况 11 参考文摘引言： 12 原创性声明（模板） 13 文章致谢（模板） 14 正文 髋关节置换术治疗老年移位型股骨颈骨折患者的效果观察（基础医学范文） 文1：髋关节置换术治疗老年移位型股骨颈骨折患者的效果观察 [Abstract]Objective To investigate the effect of hip arthroplasty （HA） and internal fixation （IF） in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients.Methods 65 cases of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture were selected as the subjects，who were hospitalized in our hospital from July 2010 to January 2015.They were divided into the HA group （31 cases） and the IF group （34 cases） according to different treatment methods.The patients in the IF group were treated with IF，and the patients in the HA group were treated with HA.The intraoperative blood loss，duration of operation，length of hospital stay，incidence of postoperative complication and reoperation rate in the two groups were recorded.The hip function of the two groups was compared in the fit，second yea after operation.Results Compared with the HA group，the IF group patients had less intraoperative bleeding，shorter operation time and shorter hospitalization time，and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant （P0.05）.The long term postoperative complication rate was 26.5% in the IF group and was 9.7% in the HA group，the reoperation rate was 23.5% in the IF group and was 6.5% in the HA group，the difference between the two groups was statistically significant （P0.05）.The excellent and good rate of hip joint function in the HA group was better than that in the IF group，the difference between the two groups was statistically significan