吉州公安轻伤害案件刑事和解的调研报告.pdfVIP

摘 要 有学者认为，公安机关不适合主持刑事调解。但在吉州公安 局进行的轻伤 害案件刑事和解的数据调查和访谈情况，以及本文作者亲自办理的唐某故意伤害 案，充分证明了公安机关是可以主持轻伤害案件的刑事和解的。 客观真实”一直是公安机关办理刑事案件的证明标准。然而，轻伤害案件刑 事和解的法律事实证明标准，由于其诉讼的复杂性和诉讼价值的多元追求，将超 越 客观真实”的刚性标准，来寻求相对的优势证据，并在法律事实的约束条件下， 将公正价值和效率价值取得有机的平衡。 另外，从对余某故意伤害案的 析来看，公安机关轻伤害案件的刑事和解在 在实践中也产生了一些负面问题。认识这些问题，将有助于我们进一步完善公安 机关对轻伤害案件的刑事和解的立法。 关键词：刑事和解 公安机关 轻伤害案件 1 Abstract Some scholars think that the public security organs is misfit to preside the criminal reconciliation. But it proved to be wrong by the general survey on criminal reconciliation by the Public Security Organ of Ji’Zhou and the injury case of the Tang transacted by the author. Impersonality and true” is the prove standard in the penal case transacted by the public security organs all the times. But the prove standard in the slight injury case reconciled by public security organs will surpass such a standard, because of the litigation’s complexity and the wooer of the balance between the equity and the efficiency. Otherwise, there exist some shortcomings of criminal reconciliation of slight injury cases by public security organs. The cognition will help to perfect the lawmaking of the criminal reconciliation of slight injury cases by public security organs. Key words: criminal reconciliation public security organs slight injury cases 2 目 录 引 言·····················································································································1 一、轻伤害刑事和解案件数据调查和访谈情况·······················································3 （一）总体情况···································································································3 （二）和解基本程序、步骤······