联合术式治疗直肠脱垂102例疗效分析.docVIP

联合术式治疗直肠脱垂102例疗效分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
联合术式治疗直肠脱垂102例疗效分析.doc

联合术式治疗直肠脱垂102例疗效分析 [摘要] 目的 探讨联合术式治疗直肠脱垂的临床效果,并对其治疗作用进行分析及评价。方法 回顾性分析2014年1―8月该院收治直肠脱垂患者共102例,随机分为观察组和对照组,各51例,对照组采用经腹直肠悬吊固定术治疗,观察组采用经腹、肛门联合术式方法治疗,比较两组患者的治疗效果并分析评价。 结果 对照组的治疗有效率为80.3%,观察组的治疗有效率为94.1%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);观察组患者的住院天数为(11.57±3.54)d,对照组患者的住院天数为(21.61 ± 6.23)d,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);对照组患者术后并发症的发生率为33.3%,过程组患者术后并发症的发生率为13.7%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。结论 经腹、肛门联合术式治疗直肠脱垂有效提高治愈率,缩短患者住院时间,减少患者的住院花销,同时也有利于减少患者术后并发症的发生,是值得临床推广的治疗直肠脱垂的手术的方法。 [关键词] 直肠脱垂;联合术式;临床疗效;对比 [中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)04(c)-0063-02 [Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical effect of combined operation in the treatment of rectal prolapse, and analysis and evaluate its therapeutic effects. Methods 102 cases with rectal prolapse in our hospital from January to August 2014 were retrospectively analyzed, they were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 51 cases in each group, the control group using abdominal rectal suspension fixation treatment, and the observation group adopted the combined abdome ?Canus surgery, then compared the treatment effect of patients of two groups. Results The effective rate of the treatment group was 80.3%, the effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 94.1%, the difference between two groups was statistically significant(P 0.05); the days of hospitalization for patients in the treatment group was(21.61 + 6.23) d, the days of hospitalization for patients in the control group was (21.61 + 6.23) d, the difference between two groups was statistically significant(P 0.05);the incidence of postoperative complications of the control group was 33.3%,the incidence of postoperative complications of the process group was 13.7%,the difference between two groups was statistically significant(P 0.05). Conclusion Transabdominal, anal combined with surgical treatment of rectal prolapse is effective to improve the cure rate, shorten the hospitalization time, reduce the inpatient expenses, but also conducive to reduce postoperat

文档评论(0)

ganpeid + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档