先行行为立法化问题分析-经济法学专业毕业论文.pdfVIP

摘 要 对先行行为立法化的理论价值分别是理论发展的必然选择、刑法规范所 要求的最低䲆度的道德和与罪刑法定主义相调和三方面，先行行为立法化 的实务价值为法官判案提供法律依据和树立司法权威两方面进行了分 析。 第三部分，先行行为的刑事立法。关于先行行为的立法模式，国外一般 分为总则模式、分则模式和总分结合模式几种。通过对国外立法模式的对 比与研究，并结合我国的实䱻情况，论证了我国先行行为立法模式以采取 总分结合模式为宜，具体为：总则中规定不纯正不作为犯先行行为的一 般性成立要件，分则中针对特定罪名规定特定的先行行为成立要件。 关键词：先行行为，作为义务，不纯正不作为犯，先行行为立法化 2 ABSTRACT ABSTRACT The previous act is one source of the act obligations of nontypical omission offense. The criminal law of our country no relevant legislation. The law-maker not only set relevant clause in general provisions of criminal law, but also not set it in specific provisions of criminal law. Therefore, the application of the previous act ’s theory in judicial practice has objection, easily toward two extremes: either identified the previous act improperly narrowed its scope, those which should indulge criminal acts; or expand the scope of the previous act, resulting in the criminal responsibility arbitrary expansion of the legitimate rights and violations of citizens interests. If we can legislate the previous act, and accurate the range of the act, it is significance to effectively deal with the new type of crime. The author on the basis of existing theoretical research to the general principles of the previous act, and through on the theoretical value and practical value of the previous act of legislation, elaborated with reference to the countries on the previous act of the legislative model, try to contribute the previous act of legislation mode made new views. Besides Introduction and Acknowledgements, this article is divided into three parts: The fir