- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
应用甲氨蝶呤与来氟米特联合手指操缓解活动性类风湿关节炎患者晨僵症状效果
应用甲氨蝶呤与来氟米特联合手指操缓解活动性类风湿关节炎患者晨僵症状效果
[摘要] 目的 探讨甲氨蝶呤与来氟米特联合手指操缓解活动性类风湿关节炎患者晨僵症状的效果。 方法 回顾性分析湖北医药学院附属东风医院2015年1月~2017年1月收治的活动性类风湿关节炎患者临床资料98例,根据治疗方案的不同,将其分为对照组和观察组,每组各49例。对照组采用甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特进行治疗,观察组在对照组基础上加用手指操进行治疗。比较两组患者临床疗效、手指和腕部关节疼痛程度、晨僵时间、手功能改善情况及不良反应。 结果 观察组患者总有效率(95.91%)明显高于对照组(83.67%),差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。治疗后两组患者VAS评分、晨僵时间及SOFI评分均低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。治疗后观察组上述各评分均明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P 0.05)。两组患者在治疗过程中均未出现严重不良反应。结论 应用甲氨蝶呤与来氟米特联合手指操治疗活动性类风湿关节炎临床疗效佳,可有效改善患者晨僵症状,值得临床推广。
[关键词] 甲氨蝶呤;来氟米特;手指操;活动性类风湿关节炎;疗效
[中图分类号] R593.22 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2017)11(b)-0108-04
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of methotrexate and leflunomide combined with finger exercises on relieving morning numb in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Methods From January 2015 to January 2017, 98 clinical data of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis treated in Dongfeng Hospital Affiliated to Hubei University of Medicine were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the control group and the observation group, with 49 cases in each group according to the treatment methods. The control group was given methotrexate combined with leflunomide and the observation group was given finger exercises on the basis of the control group. The clinical efficacy, finger and wrist pain, morning stiffness, hand function improvement and adverse reaction in the two groups were compared. Results The total curative rate in the observation group (95.91%) was significantly higher than that of control group (83.67%), with statistically significant difference (P 0.05). After treatment, the VAS score, morning stiffness time and signals of functional impairment score (SOFI) in the two groups were all lower than those of before treatment, the indicators above in the observation group were all lower than those of control group, with statistically significant differences (P 0.05). There were no severe adverse reactions in the two groups during the treatment. Conclusion Methotrexate and leflun
文档评论(0)