急性肢体动脉栓塞患者介入溶栓治疗临床护理效果分析.docVIP

急性肢体动脉栓塞患者介入溶栓治疗临床护理效果分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
急性肢体动脉栓塞患者介入溶栓治疗临床护理效果分析

急性肢体动脉栓塞患者介入溶栓治疗临床护理效果分析   [摘要] 目的 探讨急性肢体动脉栓塞患者介入溶栓治疗的临床护理效果。 方法 随机选择2014年4月~2015年8月,在我院进行治疗的急性肢体动脉栓塞患者200例,将其列为研究对象进行研究,分为研究组和对照组两组,两组患者均采用介入溶栓进行治疗,研究组患者采用优质护理方式,对照组患者采用常规护理方式,护理治疗后比较两组患者的病情变化情况及护理满意程度。 结果 研究组与对照组护理后病情均得到一定的改善,但是研究组病情好转的人数更多(总有效率为96.0%),对照组仅有76例患者病情得到改善(总有效率76.0%),研究组护理满意程度高于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 在急性肢体动脉栓塞患者介入溶栓治疗过程中,给予患者优质护理,可以缓解疾病给患者带来的疼痛,降低并发症的发生率,促进患者康复。   [关键词] 急性肢体动脉栓塞;介入溶栓治疗;护理;满意度   [中图分类号] R473.6 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2016)12-0153-03   Clinical nursing effect analysis of interventional thrombolysis in treatment of patients with acute limb artery embolization   XU Guofang   Department of Vascular Surgery, Shandong Zibo City Central Hospital, Zibo 255036, China   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical nursing intervention effect of acute arterial embolization in patients with thrombolytic. Methods From April 2014 to August 2015, 200 patients with acute arterial embolization in our hospital were selected as subjects, and then they were divided into study group and control group, two groups of patients were treated with interventional thrombolysis treatment, the study group was treated with high-quality care, the control group were treated with the routine care manner, after treatment, the changes in conditions and nursing satisfaction were compared between two groups. Results The study group and the control group of patients under the care of nurses, the condition improved significantly, but the number of study group(total effective rate of 96.0%) improved more significant than the control group, while there were only 76 patients in the control group(total efficiency rate of 76.0%), the satisfaction with care in the study group was higher than the control group, there was significant difference(P0.05). Conclusion In patients with acute arterial embolization interventional thrombolytic treatment, patients giving quality of care, can ease the pain of the disease to patients, reduce the incidence of complications and

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档