腹腔镜下完成宫颈癌保留神经平面广泛子宫切除术可行性分析.docVIP

腹腔镜下完成宫颈癌保留神经平面广泛子宫切除术可行性分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹腔镜下完成宫颈癌保留神经平面广泛子宫切除术可行性分析

腹腔镜下完成宫颈癌保留神经平面广泛子宫切除术可行性分析   [摘要] 目的 分析腹腔镜下完成宫颈癌保留神经平面广泛子宫切除术(NPSRH)的可行性。 方法 选取2013年4月~2014年7月在江苏省新沂市人民医院行宫颈癌手术的88例患者。根据手术方法进行分组,对照组32例实施非保留神经平面广泛子宫切除术,实验组56例实施NPSRH,对两组患者的手术指标和膀胱、直肠功能指标情况以及不良反应发生率进行比较分析。 结果 实验组手术时间和术中出血量显著高于对照组,恢复时间和并发症发生率显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P 0.05);实验组排气时间、留置尿管时间、排尿间隔时间显著低于对照组,最大尿流率显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P 0.05);实验组术后远期不良反应发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。实验组Ⅰ期及Ⅱa期子宫颈癌患者3年生存率均为25.0%(14例),Ⅱb期子宫颈癌患者为44.6%(25例),均明显高于对照组Ⅰ期子宫颈癌[2.5%(14例)]、Ⅱb期子宫颈癌患者[5例(15.6%)]以及Ⅱb期的子宫颈癌患者[25.0%(8例)],差异均有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 在腹腔镜下采用NPSRH治疗宫颈癌可行性强,临床功能恢复良好。   [关键词] 宫颈癌;腹腔镜;保留神经平面广泛子宫切除术;临床效果   [中图分类号] R713.4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2015)01(b)-0046-05   [Abstract] Objective To analyze feasibility of completing cervical cancer nerve-sparing plane radical hysterectomy (NPSRH) in laparoscopic. Methods 88 cases of patients with implementation of cervical cancer surgery in the Peoples Hospital of Xinyi City from April 2013 to July 2014 were selected, and according to surgical methods, they were divided into 32 cases of control group of non-nerve-sparing plane radical hysterectomy, 56 cases of the experimental group of implement a wide range of uterine NPSRH, surgical indicators and bladder, rectum function parameters as well as the incidence of adverse reactions of patients in two groups were compared with survival. Results The operative time and blood loss in the experimental group were significantly higher, and the recovery time and complication rate was significantly lower than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05); exhaust time, indwelling catheter time, voiding interval in the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the maximum flow rate was significantly higher, the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05); long-term adverse effects after surgery in the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档