- 1、本文档共36页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
PAGE
PAGE IV
Abstract
On November 20, 2006, The Department of Commerce of the US(DOC) announced to conduct its countervailing investigation upon imported Chinese
coated free sheet paper(CFS). This case is called “ America’s first CVD(short for
countervailing duty)case against China”, which also is the first CVD case against an NME worldwide. While conducting the CVD investigation, DOC also carried on its anti-dumping(AD) investigation using a surrogate country to
determine the normal value of imported CFS from China.
This is a signal which indicates that the US has started to apply its CVD law to China officially, which also means Chinese export products is threatened by anti-dumping and countervailing measures simultaneously. This case also sets up an example for other countries who has not acknowledged China’s market economy status. This may create dual discrimination against Chinese products all around the world. Thus it is of great practice value and practical significance to study this case thoroughly and to propose some effective suggestions.
Because no country had taken countervailing measures to Chinese products before Canada did in 2004, there is little study conducted on this matter. Because this is also the first time CVD measures and “surrogate country” methods were adopted in the same case, the research material is especially scarce. Even though there are a few articles on magazines and newspapers, most of them are not analysis from the legal point of view. No research paper has focused on this matter up until now as far as I know.
After consulting books and reference materials in the library, searching websites in Chinese or English and reading related case data, the writer adopt the research method on substantial evidences to analyze this case under the American national law and the international law to examine the legality of applying CVD law to Chinese products and the rationality of taking both countervailing measures and AD measures against C
您可能关注的文档
- 蒙特利尔公约客运赔偿责任制度研究-国际法学专业毕业论文.docx
- 民法调整对象“平等主体关系说”反思-民商法学专业毕业论文.docx
- 蒙古国与中国贸易发展现状研究-财政学专业毕业论文.docx
- 民航机场不正常航班服务补救研究-企业管理专业毕业论文.docx
- 马克思历史生成论研究-马克思主义基本原理专业毕业论文.docx
- 梅贻琦大学德育思想研究-思想政治教育专业毕业论文.docx
- 慢性湿疹及神经性皮炎外用方剂组方用药规律研究-中医外科学专业毕业论文.docx
- 抗磷脂综合征患者血浆中补体激活片段与炎症的关系及临床意义-内科学(风湿病学)专业毕业论文.docx
- 米歇尔·奥巴马北京大学演讲 模拟交传实践报告-翻译(英语口译)专业毕业论文.docx
- 论中学历史教学中自强不息意识的培养-学科教学·历史专业毕业论文.docx
最近下载
- 城市轨道交通车厢LCD电子地图设置标准、列车车门号编号设置原则、各线线路号.pdf VIP
- 乡镇政法委员个人述职报告.docx VIP
- 伍德里奇计量经济学答案.doc
- 2023年天津中德应用技术大学公共课《思想道德基础与法律修养》科目期末试卷A(有答案).docx VIP
- 2023年广东省深圳市育才第二中学中考一模物理免费试卷完整版.docx VIP
- Q XMJL 644-2016_XML504系列工程车 企业标准.pdf
- 数字化转型驱动经济高质量发展的路径分析.docx VIP
- 冷锅串串项目商业计划书.pptx VIP
- 计算机程序设计员理论试题(题库).pdf VIP
- 晕血晕针的应急处理.pptx
文档评论(0)