网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

美国对华铜版纸反补贴案实证分析-法律学专业毕业论文.docx

美国对华铜版纸反补贴案实证分析-法律学专业毕业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共36页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
PAGE PAGE IV Abstract On November 20, 2006, The Department of Commerce of the US(DOC) announced to conduct its countervailing investigation upon imported Chinese coated free sheet paper(CFS). This case is called “ America’s first CVD(short for countervailing duty)case against China”, which also is the first CVD case against an NME worldwide. While conducting the CVD investigation, DOC also carried on its anti-dumping(AD) investigation using a surrogate country to determine the normal value of imported CFS from China. This is a signal which indicates that the US has started to apply its CVD law to China officially, which also means Chinese export products is threatened by anti-dumping and countervailing measures simultaneously. This case also sets up an example for other countries who has not acknowledged China’s market economy status. This may create dual discrimination against Chinese products all around the world. Thus it is of great practice value and practical significance to study this case thoroughly and to propose some effective suggestions. Because no country had taken countervailing measures to Chinese products before Canada did in 2004, there is little study conducted on this matter. Because this is also the first time CVD measures and “surrogate country” methods were adopted in the same case, the research material is especially scarce. Even though there are a few articles on magazines and newspapers, most of them are not analysis from the legal point of view. No research paper has focused on this matter up until now as far as I know. After consulting books and reference materials in the library, searching websites in Chinese or English and reading related case data, the writer adopt the research method on substantial evidences to analyze this case under the American national law and the international law to examine the legality of applying CVD law to Chinese products and the rationality of taking both countervailing measures and AD measures against C

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档