美国对华铜版纸反补贴案实证分析-法律学专业毕业论文.docxVIP

PAGE PAGE IV Abstract On November 20, 2006, The Department of Commerce of the US(DOC) announced to conduct its countervailing investigation upon imported Chinese coated free sheet paper(CFS). This case is called “ America’s first CVD（short for countervailing duty）case against China”, which also is the first CVD case against an NME worldwide. While conducting the CVD investigation, DOC also carried on its anti-dumping(AD) investigation using a surrogate country to determine the normal value of imported CFS from China. This is a signal which indicates that the US has started to apply its CVD law to China officially, which also means Chinese export products is threatened by anti-dumping and countervailing measures simultaneously. This case also sets up an example for other countries who has not acknowledged China’s market economy status. This may create dual discrimination against Chinese products all around the world. Thus it is of great practice value and practical significance to study this case thoroughly and to propose some effective suggestions. Because no country had taken countervailing measures to Chinese products before Canada did in 2004, there is little study conducted on this matter. Because this is also the first time CVD measures and “surrogate country” methods were adopted in the same case, the research material is especially scarce. Even though there are a few articles on magazines and newspapers, most of them are not analysis from the legal point of view. No research paper has focused on this matter up until now as far as I know. After consulting books and reference materials in the library, searching websites in Chinese or English and reading related case data, the writer adopt the research method on substantial evidences to analyze this case under the American national law and the international law to examine the legality of applying CVD law to Chinese products and the rationality of taking both countervailing measures and AD measures against C