- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
实用医学影像杂志 2017,05(18),383-385 DOI: 10.16106/j.cnki.cn 14-1281 /r.2017.05.006
多层螺旋CT低剂量扫描技术在儿童急 性阑尾炎中的应用
武林杨复宾
苏州大学附属儿童医院放射科
导出/参考文献关注
分享
收藏打印
摘要:
目的探讨分析螺旋CT低剂量扫描技术在儿童急性阑尾炎诊断中的应用价值。方 法选取我院拟诊为急性阑尾炎的患儿60例,使用随机数字法平均分为A组(低 剂量扫描)及B组(常规剂量扫描),将2组扫描后诊断结果与手术病理诊断结 果进行对比分析,计算2组的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值、阳性预测值及准确 度。结果2组X射线剂量差异明显(P0. 05),各项图像指标及图像质量无明 显差异(P0. 05)。2组结果与手术病理诊断结果相比,A组CT诊断敏感性、阳 性预测值、阴性预测值、特异性及准确度分别为97. 1%. 100%、84.3%、100%、 97. 0%;B组CT诊断敏感性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、特异性及准确度分别为 97.3%、100%、83.3%、100%、97.0%,组间相比差异无统计学意义(P0. 05)。 结论运用64排螺旋CT低剂量扫描技术诊断儿童急性阑尾炎具有简便有效、辐 射小且准确率高等优点,值得临床推广。
关键词:
阑尾炎;体层摄影术,螺旋计算机;儿童;
作者简介:杨复宾,Ema订:yangfubin 123@sina. com
收稿日期:2017-05-12
The application of spiral CT low-dose scanning technique in acute appendicitis in children
Wu Lin Yang Fubing
Department of Radiology, Ch订dren s Hospital of
Soochow Univercity;
Abstract:
Objective To study the value of 64-si ice spiral ct low-dose searrning technique in the diagnosis of in chi 1dren, to determine its clinical significancc in the trcatment of acute appcndicitis of the childrcn. Methods Sixty children with acute appendic it is were selec ted and divided into group A (low dose scanning group) and group B (routine dose scanning) by random nu mb er method. The results were compared with those of pathology. The diagnostic resuIts were compared and the sensitivity, specificity, negativc prcdictivc value, positivc prcdictive value and accuracy of the two groups were calculated. Results The difference of X-ray dose between the two groups was significant (P0. 05) , and there was no significant differenee between the two indexes (P0. 05) . Compared with the resuIts of surgical diagnosis, the sensitivity, positive predictive value, specificity and accuracy of CT diagnosis were 97. 1%, 100%, 84. 3%, 100% and 97. 0% respectively in group A The sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, specificity and accuracy of CT were 97.3%, 100%, 83. 3%, 100% and 97. 0%, respectively. There was no significant differenee betwee
原创力文档


文档评论(0)