On the evaluation of incentive is double-edged sword.docVIP

On the evaluation of incentive is double-edged sword Scientific assessment, encouraging innovation in education evaluation is the driving force. Evaluation of incentive to mobilize the enthusiasm of students, promote active participation, self-study, to protect our students self-esteem, enhance their confidence. Deal with the classroom teachers, different students take different evaluation criteria, on different occasions to different forms of evaluation. With the evaluation methods of reform, teachers are fond of the evaluation of incentive, but I found that when teachers encourage the use of some is indeed questionable validity. Myth one: to lead a small prize to students? In “the evaluation of the incentive function” of the initiative, teachers seem to be more caring students, often using various forms of incentives. A school, teachers encourage discourse - “the teacher here, some small prizes, a little later to see which students in outstanding performance in the classroom, the teacher took a small prize given to him, “so that students come to the spirit, it seems that the purpose of learning is to get prizes. Between classes, the teachers left, “You answer was really great, give you a map” and the right one, “You’re smart, you get a pencil,” as long as the students’ answer was pretty close, sent eleven teachers small gift to show motivation, classroom time teachers distribute prizes in the slip. look at the performance of students: In order to get prizes, without serious thought hastily hand held it aloft shouted: “I, I !, “the students get prizes too long can not be happy calm, not get the opportunity to present themselves or send the students happy to Jue Qizui sound disappointed sigh As for the content of student speech, little attention has been paid, try to figure out, realized that, more not to mention ideological exchanges between students and the impact produced. Over time, students develop a impetuous, stop bad habits on the surface of th