- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
仰卧起坐动作改良对躯干核心肌力平衡影响
仰卧起坐动作改良对躯干核心肌力平衡的影响
[摘要] 目的 探讨仰卧起坐训练及其改良动作在表面肌电检测方面的差异。 方法 2015年5~8月随机选取某部新兵128人,随机分为A组、B组、C组和D组,每组32人。A、B两组均采用传统仰卧起坐动作训练,但A组训练强度为35次/2 min,B组为70次/2 min;C、D组采用改良动作训练,C组训练强度为35次/2 min,D组为70次/2 min。于第2、4、6、8周末分批检测部分受试者腹部及腰背部肌肉表面肌电及肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MM)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)等血清指标,并对上述肌肉行MRI检查。 结果 第2、4周末各组RMS值比较差异均无统计学意义(P 0.05),第6周末C组竖脊肌RMS值高于A、B两组(P 0.05)。C组各时间点CK-MM及SOD水平高于A组(P 0.05)。MRI检查显示在第2、4、6周时各组均未见阳性变化,第8周时可见B组1例腹直肌出现边界模糊的线状或片状影,呈T1WI低信号T2WI高信号,余各组未见阳性表现。 结论 仰卧起坐改良动作有助于保持躯干核心肌力平衡,减轻局部肌肉损伤。
[关键词] 仰卧起坐;表面肌电;核心肌力;肌肉损伤
[中图分类号] R685.4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2016)06(c)-0180-04
[Abstract] Objective To discuss the differences of surface EMG signals between sit-ups training and its improvement actions. Methods From May to August 2015, 128 recruits were selected and randomly divided into group A, B, C and D, each group had 32 cases. Group A and B were trained with traditional sit ups, but the training intensity in group A was 35 times per 2 min, group B was 70 times per 2 min; group C and D were trained with improved movement training, group C training intensity was 35 times per 2 min, group D was 70 times per 2 min. The muscle surface electromyographys of the abdominal and lumbar back muscles, serum parameters of creatine kinase isoenzyme(CK-MM), superoxide dismutase(SOD) and other serum marker were detected at trained for 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks respectively, and these muscles were tested by MRI. Results There was no significant difference in RMS value between these groups at 2 and 4 weeks (P 0.05). The RMS value of the group C was higher than that of group A and B at 6 weeks (P 0.05). The CK-MM and SOD levels at any time in group C were higher than those in group A (P 0.05). MRI examination showed that at 2, 4, 6 weeks, all the groups had no positive changes, the 1 case in group B trained of the rectus muscle appeared fuzzy linear or patchy shadow at 8 weeks, T1WI appeared low signal and T2WI appeared high signal. The rest of groups had no positive expression. Co
文档评论(0)