中美物证技术文化比较分析——以物证鉴定为视角-comparative analysis of sino - us material evidence technology culture —— from the perspective of material evidence identification.docxVIP

发展进行了具体介绍。 第三部分中美物证技术文化的差异性比较。分别从人文因素和科技因素两大 模块进行中美物证技术文化的差异比较。其中 ，人文因素中包括社会基本情况、 法文化、思维方式方面的比较，科技因素中包括科学精神、科技政策和科技传播 方面的比较。 第四部分几点建议。通过前文所做的比较，为我国物证技术领域的实践提出 一些建议。建议主要从社会宣传、规范标准、制度改进、教育模式以及物证鉴定 具体争议的解决方面展开。试图从物证技术文化的领域，为我国物证技术的改革 和发展提出有价值的建议。 关键词：物证技术文化；物证鉴定；比较研究 Abstract In other areas of social science , the crazy for Culture study seems to have been studied in the past years , but in the field of criminalistic, it is a new study from recent years. Throughout the past times, the culture was regarded as some kind of soft powerand always impacted on the process of restricting the development of criminalistic. The progress of criminalistics essentially is a kind of description of objective facts , this description of the physical evidence is not equivalent to the description of the objective facts. Once technology was selected , it will be subjective . From the current judicial practice in China, clearly too many local-cultural factors was considered in the process of use of technology , the analysis and evaluation of the evidence by the court, and the integration of criminalistics and local culture can easily affect results of judicial cases. Therefore, this paper attempts to combine national culture to the development of forensic science under a country-specific analysis of the historical background ,put forward the concept of culture of criminalistics and deepen its meaning . Meanwhile, China and the United States belong to different cultural systems , comparing the two culture of criminalistic in these two very different cultural backgrounds can enrich the connotation . Meanwhile,the culture of criminalistics in the United States is featured and advanced. The differences between the developments is essentially came from the differences between the culture of criminalistics.This kind of thinking could support searching a way to reform our criminalistics and forensic science system. Therefore this paper compare the culture of criminalistics in the two countries so