急性结石性胆囊炎合并糖尿病手术治疗效果分析.docVIP

急性结石性胆囊炎合并糖尿病手术治疗效果分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
急性结石性胆囊炎合并糖尿病手术治疗效果分析

急性结石性胆囊炎合并糖尿病手术治疗效果分析   [摘要] 目的 探讨急性结石性胆囊炎合并糖尿病的手术治疗效果。 方法 选取2016年1―12月该院收治的92例急性结石性胆囊炎合并糖尿病患者,随机将其分为两组(开腹组46例和腹腔镜组46例),开腹组患者予以传统开腹手术进行治疗,腹腔镜组患者在腹腔镜下行手术治疗,并比较不同组患者手术治疗情况和术后并发症发生率。结果 腹腔镜组患者手术操作时间、术中出血量、下床活动时间、肛门排气时间和疼痛VAS评分均明显优于开腹组(P0.05);腹腔镜组患者术后并发症发生率明显低于开腹组(P0.05)。 结论 与传统开腹手术治疗相比,腹腔镜手术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎合并糖尿病具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、术后恢复时间短、术后疼痛轻和术后并发症少等优点,其值得推广借鉴。   [关键词] 急性结石性胆囊炎;糖尿病;?_腹手术服;腹腔镜手术;临床效果   [中图分类号] R575.6 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1672-4062(2017)07(b)-0007-02   Analysis of Treatment Effect of Operation in Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis and Diabetes   ZHANG Qing-ping   Huangdao District Second Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Qingdao, Shandong Province, 266400 China   [Abstract] Objective To study the treatment effect of operation in treatment of acute cholecystitis and diabetes. Methods 92 cases of patients with acute cholecystitis and diabetes admitted and treated in our hospital from January to December 2016 were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 46 cases in each, the laparotomy group adopted the traditional laparotomy treatment, while the laparoscope group adopted the laparoscopic surgery, and the operation treatment and incidence rate of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time, intraoperative bleeding amount, time to get out of bed, anal exhaust time and pain VAS score in the laparoscopic group were obviously better than those in the laparotomy group(P0.05), and the incidence rate of postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group was obviously lower than that in the laparotomy group(P0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional laparotomy, the laparoscopic surgery in treatment of acute cholecystitis and diabetes has the advantages of short operation time, less intraoperative bleeding amount, short postoperative recovery time, mild postoperative pains and few postoperative complications, and it is worth promotion and reference.   [Key words] Acute cholecystitis; Diabetes; Lap

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档