两种内固定治疗方案用于老年股骨粗隆间并粗隆下骨折疗效比较.docVIP

两种内固定治疗方案用于老年股骨粗隆间并粗隆下骨折疗效比较 目录 TOC \o 1-9 \h \z \u 目录 1 正文 1 文1：两种内固定治疗方案用于老年股骨粗隆间并粗隆下骨折疗效比较 1 1 资料与方法 2 2 结果 4 3 讨论 5 文2：两种内固定对胫骨远端骨折的疗效比较 6 1 资料与方法 7 1．2 手术方法及术后处理 7 2 结果 8 3 讨论 9 参考文摘引言： 10 原创性声明（模板） 11 文章致谢（模板） 12 正文 两种内固定治疗方案用于老年股骨粗隆间并粗隆下骨折疗效比较 文1：两种内固定治疗方案用于老年股骨粗隆间并粗隆下骨折疗效比较 [Abstract] Objective To discuss the efficacy and security of fixation with anatomic locking plate or DHS in treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Convenient selection 80 elderly patients who had been treated in our hospital from April 2010 to April 2015 for intertrochanteric fractures were selected as research objects. They were divided into group A and group B. DHS was given to group A. anatomic locking plate was given to group B. Indicato were observed. Results The operation time of group A was （±） min and the postoperative bed time was （±） weeks. The operation time of group B was （±） min and the postoperative bed time was （±） weeks. The variation in operation time and amount of bleeding during operation had no statistical significance（P）. B group of patients with postoperative bed rest time was significantly longer than that in group A （P ）； B group of patients with postoperative Harris hip score the excellent and good rate was significantly better than that of group A （P ）； B group of patients with postoperative complicatio rate was significantly lower than that of group A （P ）. Conclusion Anatomic locking plate will enhance the efficiency of fracture and Reduce the risk of postoperative complicatio。 [Key words] Anatomic locking plate； DHS； Internal fixation； Intertrochanteric；Intertrochanteric fractures 股骨粗隆间骨折是一种好发于老年人群骨科常见创伤性疾病，流行病学研究显示，其患者人数约占髋关节骨折总数45%～50%，而其中合并粗隆下骨折比例可达10%～25%[1]。该次研究以该院2010年4月—2015年4月收治老年股骨粗隆间并粗隆下骨折患者共80例作为研究对象，分别采用DHS和解剖型锁定钢板内固定方案治疗，探讨两种内固定方案治疗老年股骨粗隆间并粗隆下骨折临床疗效及安全性差异，现报道如下。 1 资料与方法 一般资料 研究对象方便选取该院2010年4月—2015年4月收治的老年股骨粗隆间并粗隆下骨折患者共80例，研究前均征得患者知情同意，并通过该院伦理委员会批准。以随机区组法分为A组和B组，每组40例；A组患者