驳商标被动使用保护论.pdfVIP

驳商标被动使用保护论 谢中文 黄汇 内容提要:为应对商标俗称抢注案以维持商标权保护的实质正义，理论界启动了所谓的在先商 标被动使用保护论。但该理论存在诸多法理上难以逾越之障碍，其既不符合商标权取得自然正当 的前提条件，也违背了商标权的私权属性和商标的契约本质，同时还与商标法上能成就商标权的使 用界定不相吻合。因此，在先商标被动使用保护论不足可取。针对商标俗称被抢注，并非舍 被动使用保护论 不可，现行《商标法》有足够的制度资源为之提供救济，如在先注册商标保护 模式、 驰名商标保护路径、 绝对禁止作为商标的保护途径、 在先企业名称权保护方法 和反不正当竞争保护手段等都可以为此类案件提供解决之道。任何一种理论的创新都应强调其法 理可行性和现实必要性，否则，一旦有了该理论且人们对该理论形成使用上的路径依赖时，却又发现 该理论自身携带严重的病理基因，人们将变得动弹不得。所以，从法理上对所谓的在先商标被动使 用保护论重新展开一番检忠和质坪殊为必妥。 关键词:在先商标保护被动使用批判与质疑问题的出路 Abstract: Given the urgency of echoing to the rush-registration cases of trademarks popular name to maintain substantive justice , academic circles put forward so-called the protection theory of passive use of prior trademarks. However, there are so many judicial obstacles to this theory, which not only come short ofthe precondition of natural justice of obtaining trademark rights , but also go against the private right characteristic of trademark rights and contract essence of trademark, as well as not conforming to the definition of trademark use in trademark law. As a result , its not sensible to accept the protection theory of passive use of prior trademarks. There are so many altematives that can provide sufficient remedy for us under the Trademark Law, including the ways of protection of prior registered 位ademark， the protection of well-known trademark, the articles to prohibit use 出 a trademark, the protection of prior enterprise name rights , Anti-unf与ir Competition protection ,and so on. Thence, its absolutely necessary to rethink and criticize the protection theory of passive use ofprior trademarks. Key Words: prior trademark protection; the passive use the。可; doubt and criticize; solution to the problems 机等电子产品上注册使用该商标。索尼爱立信移 问题的提出 动通信产品(中国)公司(以F简称索爱公 近年来