形成性评价在心电图教学中应用.docVIP

形成性评价在心电图教学中应用.doc

此“教育”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
形成性评价在心电图教学中应用

形成性评价在心电图教学中应用   [摘要] 目的 探讨形成性评价在心电图教学中的应用效果。方法 选择2012年6月~2015年6月在单县中心医院实习的2009级和2010级临床医学本科学生240人作为研究对象,均来自于济宁医学院。2010级学生作为试验组(120人),采用课前试讲、课堂表现、阶段测试及学生对教学实践活动和自我评价相结合的方式构成形成性评价成绩;2009级学生作为对照组(120人),采用传统教学方法。以平均成绩、及格率、优秀率和教学方法满意度作为评价指标,评价两种教学方法的效果。 结果 试验组学生平均成绩、优秀率和及格率均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);试验组学生满意度调查结果也优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 形成性评价方法教学效果优于传统教学方法效果,可应用于心电图的临床教学实践活动中。   [关键词] 形成性评价;心电图;教学   [中图分类号] G643 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2018)04(c)-0177-04   Application of formative assessment in electrocardiogram teaching   GUO Mei1 WANG Guochang1 GUO Rui2 GUO Peng3   1.Department of Sciense and Education,Shanxian Central Hospital, Shandong Province, Shanxian 274300, China; 2.Clinical Medicine Collage, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China; 3.Department of Liver Disease, Xiyuan Hospital, China Acadeny of Chinese Medical Science, Beijing 100091, China   [Abstract] Objective To explore the application effect of the formative assessment in electrocardiogram teaching. Methods From June of 2012 to June of 2015, 240 clinical medical undergraduate students of Grade 2009 and Grade 2010 practiced in Shanxian Central Hospital were selected as the study subjects, they all came from Jining Medical Collage. Students of Grade 2010 were selected as test group, they given trial reporting before class, performance in class, stage of testing and the teaching practice combined with self-evaluation, got formative assessment achievement; students of Grade 2010 were selected as control group, they were given traditional teaching method. The average score,pass rate and excellent rate were as evaluation indicators, the effect of two teaching methods were compared. Results The average score,the excellent rate and the pass rate of students in test group were higher than control group, the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05); the satisfaction degree of students in the test group was better than control group, the difference was statistically sig

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档